Re: mysticism etc

From: Joe E. Dees (joedees@bellsouth.net)
Date: Fri Sep 22 2000 - 01:30:21 BST

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: mysticism etc"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id BAA15378 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 22 Sep 2000 01:28:00 +0100
    Message-Id: <200009220025.UAA08968@mail3.lig.bellsouth.net>
    From: "Joe E. Dees" <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 19:30:21 -0500
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: mysticism etc
    In-reply-to: <20000921172216.B1234@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.01b)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Date sent: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 17:22:16 +0100
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: mysticism etc
    Send reply to: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    > On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 09:35:02AM -0400, Wade T.Smith wrote:
    > > Hi Robin Faichney --
    > >
    > > >> The problem remains that the claims of mystics - to have 'felt' the
    > > >> workings of the inner mysteries of the universe, range far from these
    > > >> humble health benefits,
    > > >
    > > >"The workings of the inner mysteries of the universe" has no clear
    > > >meaning, and so any claims regarding them cannot meaningfully be
    > > >assessed.
    > >
    > > Let me rephrase then, plugging in the reduced substitution from your post-
    > >
    > > The problem remains that the claims of mystics - to have 'felt' the
    > > consciousness of the universe, range far from these humble health
    > > benefits....
    >
    > I've never heard or read anyone claim to have "felt" the consciousness
    > of the universe. You persist in your delusion that you and the universe
    > are two different things. The insight is that there's no good reason to
    > take that view. If you're conscious, the universe is conscious.
    >
    If we're conscious, then discrete systemic parts of the universe are
    (sufficiently complex to be) conscious. Not everything in it; or at
    least we have no evidence to indicate so.
    > --
    > Robin Faichney
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 22 2000 - 01:29:18 BST