Fw: Part One --- Outline -- A-F revision one.

From: Kenneth Van Oost (Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be)
Date: Tue Sep 19 2000 - 20:39:08 BST

  • Next message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Fw: Part One --- Outline -- A-F revision one."

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA07069 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 19 Sep 2000 20:10:44 +0100
    Message-ID: <003101c02271$5f66df00$c703bed4@default>
    From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: "memetics" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: Fw: Part One  --- Outline -- A-F  revision one.
    Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 21:39:08 +0200
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Kenneth Van Oost <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: <LJayson@aol.com>
    Cc: memetics <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 9:35 PM
    Subject: Re: Part One --- Outline -- A-F revision one.

    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: <LJayson@aol.com>
    >
    > Len here is part 2
    >
    > You wrote,
    >
    > > D. As opposed to the selfplex, all memes and memeplexes come
    > > from the environment.
    >
    > << Not necessarily, like I said, take the solipsistic view and
    meme(plexes)
    > can
    > start up from their own case, ex- hoypothesi.
    > In that respect, we can say unconscient, and therefor we must assume that
    > memes work in a solipsistic way. They start up from their own case just
    for
    > the purpose to propagate themselves further without regarding if the meme-
    > tic lineage is good or bad for their host_that is you !!
    >
    > However, your unique selfplex is a result of memes acting solipsisticly,
    > there-
    > for, your unique selfplex is an illusion and you may think that you affect
    > these
    > memes but it is the other way round, these memes affect how you expe-
    > rience yourself, that is indeed by modifying subjective emotion etc. >>
    >
    > You wrote,
    > > E. The human mind is a massirve repository of memes and
    > > memeplexes. They control, motivate, and drive the human to
    > > activity for the sole purpose of replication, always consistent
    > > with, and modified by, the individual's own selfplex.
    >
    > << Not necessarily consistent, people do strange things which are not
    always
    > reduceble to aspects of the selplex f. e I think at " declaring somebody
    to
    > be of unsound mind. " Committing murder in such circumstances is not con-
    > sistent with somebody selfplex I think. By the way, there is always
    > discussion
    > possible...>>
    >
    >
    > > Hi Ken,
    > > I believe that this A-F comes a bit closer to what you have in mind.
    > > My greatest problem is fitting in solipsistic viewpoints to
    > > what I've so far written. Or, should we leave well enough alone
    > > and get into the topic of solipism later in the paper? It would
    > > first need your definition of solipism and then we could weave it into
    > > the memetic points that we've already articulated.
    > > What do you think?
    >
    > Len fitting in solipsistic viewpoints is not the problem I think, it is
    quit
    > easy...
    > fit in an egoistic line of thinking in the way you think...place yourself
    in
    > the
    > space which memes usually take, and see the world through their eyes.
    > With the remark that yoy have to think for each selective meme(plex) sepe-
    > rately, you have to think for each memetic lineage created. Not easy, I
    can
    > 't do it either...I am not a expert, but maby being an individualist helps
    > me, I don 't
    > know...
    > The problem as I see it, is to determine a definition of solipsism in
    > association
    > with meme()(tics) between the both of us...
    >
    > Mine definition would be...solipsism is the conception wherein reality
    > equals
    > somebody 's own ( memetic) existence.
    > I am not sure if that solves the problem...
    > By the way, point G to L...I didn 't get to it...please wait....
    >
    > Best regards,
    >
    > Kenneth
    >
    > ( I ma, because we are)
    >
    >
    > >
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Sep 19 2000 - 20:12:09 BST