Re: empirical "memetics"

From: William Benzon (bbenzon@mindspring.com)
Date: Tue Sep 19 2000 - 19:23:16 BST

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: memetics and knowledge"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA06800 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 19 Sep 2000 19:23:36 +0100
    User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.0 (1513)
    Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 14:23:16 -0400
    Subject: Re: empirical "memetics"
    From: William Benzon <bbenzon@mindspring.com>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Message-ID: <B5ED2745.4992%bbenzon@mindspring.com>
    In-Reply-To: <20000919175642.AAA24091@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>
    Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    > From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
    > Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 13:55:16 -0400
    > To: "memetics list" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    > Subject: Re: empirical "memetics"
    >
    > On 09/19/00 13:41, William Benzon said this-
    >
    >> While Martindale nowhere uses the term or concept of "meme" he more than
    >> makes up for that "deficiency" by providing a great deal of data on the
    >> evolution of art, mainly poetry and music, but also painting.
    >
    > Which brings up my very basic, oft-wondered, never answered, query-
    >
    > Just because something cultural (in this case artistic) changes (changes
    > from what to what, I wonder internally as subset), can we really say it
    > is 'evolving'? Again, compared to what? (in the eternal plea of Eddie
    > Harris and Les McCann....)
    >
    > Granting the wheel, is the automobile an 'evolution' of the horse
    > carriage?
    >
    > Where is the analog of speciation within culture?

    Yes. Read this:

    Culture as an Evolutionary Arena. Journal of Social and Evolutionary
    Systems, 19(4), 321-362, 1996.

    ABSTRACT

    Culture is an evolutionary domain in which paradigms evolve through the
    replication and variation of memes and psychological traits. In biology
    genes flow in such a restricted way that there is a relatively transparent
    relationship between genealogy and taxonomy. In culture memes are borrowed
    freely between lineages so that a given paradigm may have contributions from
    many cultures. Further, under certain conditions cultures come into such
    intimate contact that the process of creolization produces new paradigms
    within a relatively few generations. Consequently cultural taxonomy is
    inherently more complex than biological taxonomy. Dynamically, over the long
    term culture exhibits an S-shaped growth curve which reflects the
    proliferation of memes within cultures. Perhaps the deepest issue in
    cultural evolution is the Gestalt switch which happens between the highest
    level of one cultural rank and the beginning of the next rank.

    >
    > And I ask this because, dammit, I don't see it. Improvements and
    > alterations are not necessarily evolutions, IMHO.
    >
    > Had Martindale shown that the _reason_ man creates art has evolved over
    > the eons?
    >

    Why should it?

    > - Wade
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Sep 19 2000 - 19:25:48 BST