Re: memetics and knowledge

From: Robin Faichney (robin@reborntechnology.co.uk)
Date: Mon Sep 18 2000 - 12:29:24 BST

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: memetics and knowledge"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA02453 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 18 Sep 2000 13:04:06 +0100
    Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 12:29:24 +0100
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: memetics and knowledge
    Message-ID: <20000918122924.A1783@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    References: <20000918011306.AAA12739@camailp.harvard.edu@[204.96.32.215]>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i
    In-Reply-To: <20000918011306.AAA12739@camailp.harvard.edu@[204.96.32.215]>; from wade_smith@harvard.edu on Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 09:13:09PM -0400
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 09:13:09PM -0400, Wade T.Smith wrote:
    > >>But, yes, somatic
    > >> 'knowledge' is another path the senses use to offer experience to the
    > >> brain.
    > >
    > >Wouldn't it be simpler to say: we can learn through our senses, as well
    > >as through symbolic communications?
    >
    > 'Learning through our senses' sounds nonsensical to me. Machines can
    > sense- all instrumentations are sensory systems at one level.

    That's funny. The notion that machines can sense seems very strange to
    me, but I'm quite happy for them to learn, assuming they've been designed
    to do so. But this is entirely semantics, isn't it?

    > The
    > straw here is that the mystic has no bicycle (of whatever material) to
    > offer the neophyte, and never did and never will.

    That's just a statement of your faith, isn't it. Otherwise, let's see
    some evidence.

    Of course, it would help if you're using the same definition of "mystic"
    as me, which I've taken some trouble to explain here recently, which
    discussion you've taken part in, contributing several quotations from
    dictionaries. Unless you prefer to revert to "religious superstition",
    of course, in which case there's no argument.

    -- 
    Robin Faichney
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 18 2000 - 13:05:16 BST