Re: memetics and knowledge

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Mon Sep 18 2000 - 02:13:09 BST

  • Next message: LJayson@aol.com: "Re: Purported mystical "knowledge""

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id CAA00851 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 18 Sep 2000 02:15:55 +0100
    Subject: Re: memetics and knowledge
    Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 21:13:09 -0400
    x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
    x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
    To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Message-ID: <20000918011306.AAA12739@camailp.harvard.edu@[204.96.32.215]>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    >>But, yes, somatic
    >> 'knowledge' is another path the senses use to offer experience to the
    >> brain.
    >
    >Wouldn't it be simpler to say: we can learn through our senses, as well
    >as through symbolic communications?

    'Learning through our senses' sounds nonsensical to me. Machines can
    sense- all instrumentations are sensory systems at one level. I really
    think 'offering experience to the brain' is a more apt and simpler way to
    describe the functionality of the senses in the body, as they relate to
    'mind'. And all that symbolic communication has to be sensed firstly and
    primarily.

    >> When I encounter the straw bicycle upon which to teach this straw man,
    >> I'll let ya know....
    >
    >Why don't you just say what you mean? Unless, of course, you prefer
    >mystification?

    There is no way to pass on to someone else a somatic skill- regardless of
    your completeness of explanation, there will never be a point at which
    you can impart the skill to balance upon two wheels to another. You can
    not, even, impart it to yourself without being astride a bicycle. The
    straw here is that the mystic has no bicycle (of whatever material) to
    offer the neophyte, and never did and never will. And there is no actual
    skill the mystic has to impart. The mystic (and anyone else, for that
    matter) can, at best, offer good explanations of perceptual states-
    describe the point of balance, for instance- but somatic experience
    itself will remain available only to the actual experiencer- indeed, only
    to the actual set of senses and brain resident at one particular moment
    in an individual. Mystics tend to, um, concentrate on areas of perception
    that are difficult (if not uncannily and totally unnecessary) to reach.

    Riding a bicycle gets more done than feeling the love at the center of
    the universe.

    Blessed be my Schwinn....

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 18 2000 - 02:17:04 BST