Re: solipsistic view on memetics

From: Kenneth Van Oost (Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be)
Date: Fri Sep 15 2000 - 20:03:06 BST

  • Next message: Douglas Brooker: "Re: solipsistic view on memetics"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA23217 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 15 Sep 2000 20:06:33 +0100
    Message-ID: <001d01c01f4c$1b210be0$e506bed4@default>
    From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <200009130430.AAA28974@mail4.lig.bellsouth.net> <200009140119.VAA05577@mail0.lig>
    Subject: Re: solipsistic view on memetics
    Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 21:03:06 +0200
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Joe E. Dees <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    ...
    > >
    > My point here is that human infants are little machines genetically
    > programmed to transcend their programming, and to become free
    > and unique individuals rather than have their responses
    > circumscribed by species-wide instincts.

    << Joe, are you saying here, that is essence there is no collectiviness ?
    That we, their parents inflick collectiviness on our children ? Interesting
    !>>

        It just means that there is no essence-in-general for selfhood, and each
    human self-consciousness spends its life constructing its own
    essence-in-particular.

    << So, each of us is a solipsistc being because our memes spent their lives
    constructing self- consciousness for their host in order to propagate
    themselves,
    that is the memes, further ?>>

    Our minds ARE esconsed in the evolving world, AND
    > an evolving representation of the world resides in each mind. And
    > while it is true that a representation of the world is not, and can
    > never be, the world itself, as the map is never the territory, we
    > yet experientially refine our individual maps throughout our lives to
    > most closely match the common territory (and the individual
    > aspects of it) which they represent.

    << Does this not mean, IMHO that our mind and therefor our memes are
    working in a solipsistic way...the representation of the world resides in
    each
    mind and I suppose that those representations are in each mind different due
    to
    variation and selection of affects...!? >>

    Many regards,

    Kenneth

    ( I am, because we are)

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 15 2000 - 20:09:12 BST