Re: Article, A Solipsistic View On Memetics Part 6

From: LJayson@aol.com
Date: Wed Sep 13 2000 - 19:17:01 BST

  • Next message: Douglas Brooker: "Re: solipsistic view on memetics"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA15581 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 13 Sep 2000 19:20:19 +0100
    From: <LJayson@aol.com>
    Message-ID: <95.7f5e0a.26f11e9d@aol.com>
    Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 14:17:01 EDT
    Subject: Re: Article, A Solipsistic View On Memetics  Part 6
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    CC: Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 117
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Part 6

    The remaining quality in order to have evolution is heredity.
    How in Gods name can I have inheredible properties if I am the only conscient
    mind to exist !?

    We do have heredity and therefor evolution in the outside world, along the
    lineages of variation, imitation and selection the brain brings ideas of here-
    dity into the outside world.

    Even so, my brain, as a solipsistic one, perceives the increase of the other
    minds as some kid of heredible process, knowing for sure I won 't_heredity
    is a quality which my brain produces in order to give me an evolutionary
    picture of the reality out there.

    Len:
    You wrote: "....heredity is a quality which my brain produces in order
    to give me an evolutionary picture of the reality out there."
    Are you postulaing that "your brain" and "you" are two separate entities?

    In some sense, it is not even that. It is more of an illusion in order to
    " explain " each time the slight different " readjustments " of ' reality
    '
    which my brain lets me ' exhibite '.
    I ' think ' the outside world evolves as in fact it is my brain which can 't
    " replicate " an accurate picture of the previous immertry.

    But what about myself !? How can I propagate myself !? I can propagate
    myself in a solipsistic way along the then somewhat perversive memetic
    lineage of believing I am having sex with one of those humanoid objects.

    But as an genetic organism i can also assume that my brain replicates
    all of me into another unique container, but if ' I ' have died where is the
    " me " going to !?

    Len:
    Isn't your offspring's container only 50% of your genome?
    Wouldn't you agree that your 'container' has died but a 'partial'
    genetic copy of you is inherited by your offspring? In that
    sense, it seems that only part of your "me" does live on.

    Slight different_ if my genotype was/ is accurate replicated where is the
    phenotype gone to !?

    Len:
    Doesn't the phenotype die with the container?
    Doesn't each new generation produce it's own phenotype?

    That is, I percieve evolution in the outside world, my reality evolves along
    the different memetic lineages inside my brain, but what about me !?
    How is it possible that the ' Self ' ( as the only one known to itself to
    exist) as an illusion stays in another brain but that the ' me ' disappears
    !?

    Len:
    I'm not sure I undertand what other brain you are considering.
    I agree that the brain inside the container disappears along with the
    container.

    This process begins with a rather unusual problem. Another solipsistic
    brain !?
    Impossible_that is contrary to the basis tenet of solipsism !!
    If that is the case, the hypothesis is wrong. Pure and simple !!

    Len:
    Isn't each brain is a unique solipsistic entity?

    Or, there is the possibility that I am one of the ' other minds '.
    In that case I have the genetic line- up which is aquired for a heredible
    process.

    Len:
    In the sense that the human species shares certain genetic hardwiring,
    each one of us is---in that sense---one of the 'other minds.'
    Is that what you mean?

    That is, there is nothing that can exclude me being part of a greater con-
    sciousness ( that is the one and only solipsistic mind).
    Something I can emphize, because all what is and exists is happening
    inside my brain>. SO, the idea of a mush greater consciousness is consistent
    with the solipsism doctrine, the idea is dependent on the one mind which is
    known to me to exist_MINE !!
    In some way I am helping that greater consciousness somehoww creating a
     reality for it. In order to do so is it essential that I am aware of the
    fact that
     I am the only mind known to exist.

    Len:
    I can understand how each individual with his unique solipsistic mind
    is helping to create the reality of a greater consciousness.

    Regarding such assumptions we have to emiphize that all the other minds
    don 't have to be conscient too. That is, to keep the reality going it is of
    no
    necessity to define more than one mind conscient.
    In that case the doctrine of solipsism stays coherent within its qualities and
    the result is a solipsisitc world wherein memes find their place.

    Kenneth,
    I have found your six part article both provocative and interesting.
    Thank you for sharing it.

    Best wishes,
    Len

                                        End of the Article

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Sep 13 2000 - 19:21:27 BST