Re: solipsistic view on memetics

From: Chris Lees (chrislees@easynet.co.uk)
Date: Wed Sep 13 2000 - 16:16:25 BST

  • Next message: LJayson@aol.com: "Re: Article, A Solipsistic View On Memetics Part 6"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id QAA15294 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 13 Sep 2000 16:19:12 +0100
    Message-Id: <f04310101b5e5456e052e@[194.154.110.185]>
    In-Reply-To: <20000913141134.AAA6270@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>
    References: <20000913141134.AAA6270@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>
    Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 16:16:25 +0100
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    From: Chris Lees <chrislees@easynet.co.uk>
    Subject: Re: solipsistic view on memetics
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Wade wrote :

    >Does the intellect really need a booster rocket?

    Your close to where my thought is here , Wade, but I don't conceive
    of an individual intellect needing a boost. What I was getting
    at, is that our collective knowledge advances as new minds add
    conceptual richness to our vocabulary, and that this sometimes
    allows us to discuss areas which were previously totally obscure.
    So what I'm saying is that there is a challenge, to any individual
    intellect, to formulate conceptual tools, even neologisms, to refine
    the enquiry so that those who are interested can comprehend more.

    Zen practice certainly produces or allows extraordinary experiences.
    Yet there does not seem to be anything weird or abnormal involved,
    but rather a feeling of getting closer to what is 'kinda true and natural'
    if you'll forgive the woolly phrase. These experiences must have *some*
    connection to other domains of human enquiry, such as western psychology,
    deconstruction, neuroscience, info theory, etc. It's legitimate to
    discuss what those connections might look like. Nothing 'mystical'
    about that, in whatever way the word is interpreted. It's a treacherous word
    and causes endless avoidable confusion whenever it gets used because
    everyone is automatically talking at cross-purposes. Best avoid imo
    and speak of specific examples, such as Sufi or Blake's or whatever.

    I've got to drop out again now, but thanks to all for the thoughts and
    comments.

    C.L.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Sep 13 2000 - 16:20:22 BST