RE: Gender Bias For Memes

From: Joe E. Dees (joedees@bellsouth.net)
Date: Sat Jul 22 2000 - 22:05:30 BST

  • Next message: Joe E. Dees: "RE: Was Freud a Minivan or S.U.V. Kind of Guy? Israel and Palestine."

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id WAA03637 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 22 Jul 2000 22:02:54 +0100
    Message-Id: <200007222101.RAA18439@mail6.lig.bellsouth.net>
    From: "Joe E. Dees" <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 16:05:30 -0500
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: RE: Gender Bias For Memes
    In-reply-to: <LPBBICPHCJJBPJGHGMCIAEIECHAA.ddiamond@ozemail.com.au>
    References: <200007221908.PAA26363@mail2.lig.bellsouth.net>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.01b)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    From: "Chris Lofting" <ddiamond@ozemail.com.au>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Gender Bias For Memes
    Date sent: Sun, 23 Jul 2000 06:41:18 +1000
    Send reply to: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    >
    >
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On Behalf
    > > Of Joe E. Dees
    > > Sent: Sunday, 23 July 2000 5:12
    > > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > > Subject: RE: Gender Bias For Memes
    > >
    > >
    > > From: "Chris Lofting" <ddiamond@ozemail.com.au>
    > > To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    > > Subject: RE: Gender Bias For Memes
    > > Date sent: Sun, 23 Jul 2000 05:06:26 +1000
    > > Send reply to: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > > -----Original Message-----
    > > > > From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    > > [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On Behalf
    > > > > Of Joe E. Dees
    > > > > Sent: Sunday, 23 July 2000 3:26
    > > > > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > > > > Subject: RE: Gender Bias For Memes
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > [snip]
    > > > > Considering Chris' circumnambulent loquacity, one might wonder if
    > > > > (under Chris' own categorizations) Chris is short for Christine.
    > > > > >
    > > >
    > > > :-)
    > > >
    > > > Full name is Christopher John Lofting so 'you fail' Joe :-) (or is that
    > > > Joesephine?) Perhaps if you took the time to get out more you
    > > would see the
    > > > move away from rigid gender-typing and so open yourself up
    > > more; come down
    > > > from the safety of your ivory tower and at least take-off your shoes and
    > > > socks and feel the grass under your feet -- or perhaps that is
    > > too 'female'
    > > > for you? :-)
    > > >
    > > > best,
    > > >
    > > Then you are an exception to your own rule.
    >
    > Not at all. Apply recursion to the basic persona types and all of the types
    > we 'see' pop-out. Very simple stuff.
    >
    When you use a plethoric avalanche of fuzzily quasidescriptive
    verbiage from which the claim manages to surface that men as a
    rule speak more precicely and concisely than do womem, you do
    indeed violate your own propounded rule.
    And the personality enneagram has nine stations; apply dualistic
    thinking to THAT.
    >
    > Facinating logic here Joe. You start with a false premise and then expand
    > into ga-ga land. You must do better Joe to be able to seriously address the
    > issues. Please make the effort since from my point of view all you are
    > currently doing is embarrassing yourself. I personally dont mind doing that,
    > the feedback is useful and overall I have nothing to lose :-)
    >
    Those who have nothing in their favor indeed have nothing to lose, a
    position that applies a forteriori to you AND your point of view. I
    notice that your previous politeness dropped like a rock when your
    fundamentalistic and reductionistic conception was credibly
    challenged; I expected as much.
    >
    > > Exceptions do not
    > > prove the rule, they probe its scope and range (Aristotle) by means
    > > of their status as exceptions.
    >
    > This was touched on in a recent email of mine. Read it.
    >
    Trying to make logical sense out of your screeds is like trying to
    push a stick of butter up a wildcat's nether regions with a red-hot
    poker.
    >
    > best,
    >
    > Chris.
    > ------------------
    > Chris Lofting
    > websites:
    > http://www.eisa.net.au/~lofting
    > http://www.ozemail.com.au/~ddiamond
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 22 2000 - 22:03:45 BST