Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA28140 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 20 Jul 2000 19:48:30 +0100 From: "Chris Lofting" <ddiamond@ozemail.com.au> To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Subject: RE: Was Freud a Minivan or S.U.V. Kind of Guy? Israel and Palestine. Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 05:04:07 +1000 Message-ID: <LPBBICPHCJJBPJGHGMCIKEHICHAA.ddiamond@ozemail.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745943@inchna.stir.ac.uk> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On Behalf
> Of Vincent Campbell
> Sent: Friday, 21 July 2000 12:49
> To: 'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'
> Subject: RE: Was Freud a Minivan or S.U.V. Kind of Guy? Israel and
> Palestine.
>
>
> These are not fundamental categorisations, these are your idiolectic
> categorisations, and merely supports the main point of my last post.
>
the distinctions of what/where, and the entanglement of these elements into
more complex forms, is built-in to the neurology and that dictates the
structure of all meaning that is possible 'in here'. Read the references I
gave.
The distinctions of what/where (as used in neuroscience texts) are
synonymous with those of object/relationship and when these are flesh-out,
by using recursion, into wholes, parts, static relationships and dynamic
relationships you can map these distinctions to a set of basic feelings
Blend (whole), Bound (parts), Bond (Static relationships) and Bind
(dynamics).
All of that comes straight out of analysis of the neurology and these
FUNDAMENTAL, NEUROLOGICALLY determined, categorisations were there well
before I was.
You dont like it do you. :-) What is it? the sense of containment implied,
the restraint? wouldnt worry about it, there is so much to experience that
you could do without it, ignore it. Get on with what ever you are trying to
do, let it pass. :-)
Just note that I do use the method in analysis and it does seem to aid in my
fleshing-out of ideas, concepts etc so if you find it difficult to read my
emails then just ignore them, set up your browser to filter them out.
Best,
Chris.
------------------
Chris Lofting
websites:
http://www.eisa.net.au/~lofting
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~ddiamond
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 20 2000 - 19:49:20 BST