RE: memes and sexuality

From: Chris Lofting (ddiamond@ozemail.com.au)
Date: Sun Jul 16 2000 - 15:12:29 BST

  • Next message: Chris Lofting: "RE: Memes and Sexuality"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id OAA15144 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 16 Jul 2000 14:57:15 +0100
    From: "Chris Lofting" <ddiamond@ozemail.com.au>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: memes and sexuality
    Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 00:12:29 +1000
    Message-ID: <LPBBICPHCJJBPJGHGMCIKEFMCHAA.ddiamond@ozemail.com.au>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
    X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Importance: Normal
    In-Reply-To: <001e01bfee9b$62683000$c401bed4@default>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Kenneth wrote:
    >
    >Chris, you wrote,
    >
    >>From these very general descriptions have emerged 'us ', where we are
    >>an entanglement of those properties. Thus most DIFFErence oriented end up
    as
    >>teachers, both male and female, but more female than male in primary/
    >>secondary levels.
    >
    >IMHO, I do think we are more DIFFERENCE oriented in general than you
    >realise. I think that males, and biological examples support the idea, are
    be-
    >coming more femanized, that is we take over more behaviourpatterns of the
    >' pure ' female. Dragqueens, the katoi, ' beaucoup de beau garçons ', the
    >more femanized way males dress themselves up, the way we move etc.
    >are pointing in that direction.

    Sure, my emphasis is on 'pure' forms that over time become rare :-) If you
    apply the dichotomy of male/female recursively then you get more and more
    entanglement of both 'sides' and so closer to what we see but to get to that
    you start with fundamental distinctions. Get those fundamentals correct and
    the entanglement patterns will 'fit' what we see. Get the fundamentals
    incorrect and you start to get confusion.

    best,

    Chris.
    ------------------
    Chris Lofting
    websites:
    http://www.eisa.net.au/~lofting
    http://www.ozemail.com.au/~ddiamond

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jul 16 2000 - 15:00:02 BST