Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id VAA13728 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 15 Jul 2000 21:02:21 +0100 Message-ID: <001e01bfee9b$62683000$c401bed4@default> From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be> To: "memetics" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Subject: Re: memes and sexuality Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 22:28:35 +0200 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0017_01BFEEAC.03B2D360" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Chris, you wrote,
<<From these very general descriptions have emerged 'us ', where we are
an entanglement of those properties. Thus most DIFFErence oriented end up as
teachers, both male and female, but more female than male in primary/
secondary levels. >>
IMHO, I do think we are more DIFFERENCE oriented in general than you
realise. I think that males, and biological examples support the idea, are be-
coming more femanized, that is we take over more behaviourpatterns of the
' pure ' female. Dragqueens, the katoi, ' beaucoup de beau garçons ', the
more femanized way males dress themselves up, the way we move etc.
are pointing in that direction.
Someone said that males are just a misconception of nature...
Regards,
Kenneth
(I am, because we are) humble
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 15 2000 - 21:04:09 BST