Re: Cons and Facades/memetic engineering

From: Kenneth Van Oost (Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be)
Date: Mon Jul 03 2000 - 19:01:43 BST

  • Next message: Chris Lofting: "RE: Darwinism/Lamarck -- reply to question 1"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA12090 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 3 Jul 2000 18:36:52 +0100
    Message-ID: <000901bfe518$bfe07f80$260fbed4@default>
    From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D31017458F2@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    Subject: Re: Cons and Facades/memetic engineering
    Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 20:01:43 +0200
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 2:40 PM
    Subject: RE: Cons and Facades/memetic engineering

    > One of the interesting things is how (or why) things become taboos,
    despite
    > their prevalence in human behaviour.
    >
    > Homosexuality has gone, for example, from one extreme to the other in
    terms
    > of social acceptance (e.g. Ancient Spartan society), to taboo, to our
    > current era of greater tolerance and acceptance. Incest was the preferred
    > reproductive method of Egyptian pharohs, but is now a major taboo etc.
    etc.
    >
    > Now, it seems to me, that the tolerance or condemnation of such behaviours
    > at various times is probably memetic in nature.
    >
    << Vincent, do you mean with " such behaviours at various times is probably
    memetic in nature " that such behaviours vary along the changing tread of
    human culture !? In that case, what is influencing what:- culture ><
    behaviour !?
    What kind of " effective memes " are infecting the human mind to tolerate
    or to condemn such behaviours, not in the least to take part into
    incest...!?
    Or is it possible that tolerance or condemnation are memetical engineered !?
    That is, in our society the equality-principle is held high, is it then not
    possible
    that media/ propagande etc are generating the judgment which behaviour is
    tolerated or condemned !? >>

    regards,

    Kenneth

    (I am, because we are) once more

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 03 2000 - 18:37:36 BST