Re: From the moderator: Decision about Joe Dees

From: Keith Henson (hkhenson@rogers.com)
Date: Thu 11 Dec 2003 - 00:43:12 GMT

  • Next message: stunned: "[Meme-mailer] subject line please? / cut up"

    At 06:57 PM 10/12/03 -0500, you wrote:
    >At 03:54 PM 10/12/03 +0000, you wrote:
    >>I have now have a number of complaints about Joe Dees.
    >>
    >>I will now take exceptional action (most unwillingly): Can you send me
    >>(personally *not* to the list) what action you think I should take!
    >>
    >>I will then consider what to do.
    >>
    >>Thanks.
    >>
    >>Regards.
    >>
    >>---------------------------------------------------
    >>Bruce Edmonds
    >
    >Have the complaints come from actions off list? Joe has not been posting
    >any more than I have in the last ten days, 6 postings in 10 days, and
    >there was a long period before that where nobody was posting to the list.
    >
    >I know the last place that banned him for 6 months did it because he was
    >overwhelming the list. I have not looked at his URLs because they are
    >generally off topic.
    >
    >As to what you should do . . . "The punishment should fit the crime" and
    >without knowing what he has been doing that's kind of hard to suggest.
    >
    >Keith Henson

    Sorry, my mailer got me and it went to the list instead to Bruce. Mea culpa.

    Keith

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 11 Dec 2003 - 00:47:05 GMT