Re: From the moderator: Decision about Joe Dees

From: Keith Henson (hkhenson@rogers.com)
Date: Wed 10 Dec 2003 - 23:57:51 GMT

  • Next message: Keith Henson: "Re: From the moderator: Decision about Joe Dees"

    At 03:54 PM 10/12/03 +0000, you wrote:
    >I have now have a number of complaints about Joe Dees.
    >
    >I will now take exceptional action (most unwillingly): Can you send me
    >(personally *not* to the list) what action you think I should take!
    >
    >I will then consider what to do.
    >
    >Thanks.
    >
    >Regards.
    >
    >---------------------------------------------------
    >Bruce Edmonds

    Have the complaints come from actions off list? Joe has not been posting any more than I have in the last ten days, 6 postings in 10 days, and there was a long period before that where nobody was posting to the list.

    I know the last place that banned him for 6 months did it because he was overwhelming the list. I have not looked at his URLs because they are generally off topic.

    As to what you should do . . . "The punishment should fit the crime" and without knowing what he has been doing that's kind of hard to suggest.

    Keith Henson

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 11 Dec 2003 - 00:02:05 GMT