From: Richard Brodie (richard@brodietech.com)
Date: Tue 17 Jun 2003 - 22:26:10 GMT
[TD]
> [Any] model of memetics is useful only to the extent that it clearly
> demarcates memetic and non-memetic cultural transmission.
[WS]
<<Such demarcation is _mandatory_ for memetics, because memetics is a
discussion of culture, not a discussion of information.>>
Memetics is a model of cultural evolution through differential selection of
replicators. Non-memetic cultural transmission would be the transmission of
cultural information that cannot fruitfully be viewed as a replicator. Keith
has pointed out examples of such things. I don't see the difference between
a "very bad replicator" and "not a replicator," but it's not worth arguing
over.
[TD]
> This is a very illuminating example of the difference between ideas
> that passively replicate via human consciousness and self-replicating
> (memetic) ideas.
I missed the example, but there is no difference between the two other than
point of view. It is a conceptual error to think of a replicator as having
conscious intention or physical movement. It can do all its replication
passively.
[WS]
<<And the model of memetics that defines the meme as a self-replicating
idea is the one most mistaken about culture. There is no way to
demarcate how an idea replicates, or even if such a process is
possible. Indeed, your entire sentence above is nonsensical and
illogical, by any definition of 'idea'.>>
Unfortunately for you, that's what memetics is: the study of the
self-replicating idea. And of course you continue to close your eyes to the
obvious idea replication going on all around you. Fair Harvard, thy sons to
thy jubilee throng...
Richard Brodie
www.memecentral.com
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue 17 Jun 2003 - 22:34:30 GMT