Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA21831 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 13 Jun 2000 18:52:34 +0100 Message-ID: <B6E47FBD3879D31192AD009027AC929C368929@NWTH-EXCHANGE> From: Bruce Jones <BruceJ@nwths.com> To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Subject: RE: Cons and Facades Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 12:58:36 -0500 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wade T.Smith [SMTP:wade_smith@harvard.edu]
> Subject: RE: Cons and Facades
>
> On 06/13/00 13:10, Bruce Jones said this-
>
> >facades will and do stand out like sore thumbs.
>
> Well, this is my hope.
>
[BJ]
Good! Now how to recognize a facade! Any suggestions?
> What we lack around here are descriptions of the experiments, thought or
> otherwise, that we could all run, to find, hopefully, replicable results.
>
[BJ]
I agree .... but if we can not all agree on whether or not a meme
has been identified or described ... how do we go about establishing a
standard for the measurement and replication of that meme? When the
thermometer was being worked out ... NO ONE refuted the idea, effects, or
theory of temperature ... where is the undisputed corner stone of memetics?
Bruce Jones
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jun 13 2000 - 18:53:20 BST