Re: Tell

From: Wade T. Smith (wade.t.smith@verizon.net)
Date: Wed 21 May 2003 - 23:48:40 GMT

Next message: Keith Henson: "Re: transmission"

Previous message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: transmission"
Maybe in reply to: Reed Konsler: "Tell"
Next in thread: Richard Brodie: "RE: Tell"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Wednesday, May 21, 2003, at 06:42 PM, Reed wrote:

> Quibble quibble: if you can infer the existence of someone's rule,
> then
> there must be some kind of physical expression of it. Hence, it is not
> silent. That is why they call it a "tell".

Nothing to quibble with there.

- Wade

=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

Next message: Keith Henson: "Re: transmission"
Previous message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: transmission"
Maybe in reply to: Reed Konsler: "Tell"
Next in thread: Richard Brodie: "RE: Tell"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed 21 May 2003 - 23:55:13 GMT