RE: Jabbering !

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Tue Jun 06 2000 - 12:28:19 BST

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "more on animal 'languages'"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA03396 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 6 Jun 2000 12:31:31 +0100
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D31017458AB@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Jabbering !
    Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 12:28:19 +0100 
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    This was not a journalist or presenter saying this but an anthropologist
    from Oxford, who said it in passing rather than making it a focal point of
    the programme.

    Besides, define 'really important things'.

    Personally as interesting as the origins of the industrial revolution are in
    and of themselves, the most interesting thing to me (and something not
    really addressed by the programme) is how the media of those times
    articulated and represented those events. That's the nature of my
    professional interests, and it oftern helps my teaching in media studies to
    be able to locate media developments in relationship to other
    social/political/scientific developments (my favourite of these is that the
    first newspapers to appear in Europe did so a few years before Galileo
    finally published his findings supporting the Copernican solar system in
    1632, so newspapers first appeared in an environment where most people-
    certainly the average person- in Europe- believed the Earth was the centre
    of the universe).

    Vincent

    > ----------
    > From: Chuck
    > Reply To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Sent: Monday, June 5, 2000 12:26 pm
    > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Subject: Re: Jabbering !
    >
    >
    >
    > Vincent Campbell wrote:
    >
    > > I saw the programme.
    > >
    > > I was particularly interested in two things, first the comment about the
    > > British midlands being called the Black country, and rituals and dress
    > sense
    > > becoming heavily imbued with black in the late 18th and 19th century,
    > > because of the dark satanic mills, and the mass use of coke.
    >
    > These are the kind of unobvious things the media likes to play on. They
    > are
    > almost never the really important things.
    >
    > >
    > >
    > > Second, the theory that what made Britain different from say France and
    > > Germany in terms of the Industrial Revolution occuring in the UK rather
    > than
    > > elsewhere was the social structure of English social clubs.
    > >
    > > Again the utility things comes down to differences between
    > material/manifest
    > > uses which tend to be more fixed (although like your knife as a
    > screwdriver
    > > or vice versa, shows they're never totally fixed), and ideational/latent
    > > uses (such as indicators of status etc.) which are highly varied.
    > >
    > > Vincent
    > >
    > > > ----------
    > > > From: Robin Faichney
    > > > Reply To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > > > Sent: Monday, June 5, 2000 10:09 am
    > > > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > > > Subject: RE: Jabbering !
    > > >
    > > > On Mon, 05 Jun 2000, Vincent Campbell wrote:
    > > > >Ask people what a tie is for though- what's its functionality? What
    > is
    > > > the
    > > > >bit of material under your shirt collar supposed to do? I don't
    > think
    > > > most
    > > > >people would know, and would instead ascribe far more less manifest
    > > > >(although no less important) functions like those you mention. The
    > > > problem
    > > > >then becomes one of arbitrariness- why does a strange bit of cloth
    > around
    > > > >one's neck offer all these other (social) functions that they indeed
    > do?
    > > > >
    > > > >Perhaps this is the distinctive element of cultural, as oppsed to say
    > > > >technological, artefacts, in that their (apparent) utility is highly
    > > > >flexible hence behaviours survive long after their origins have been
    > > > >forgotten.
    > > >
    > > > Tools can be extremely flexible. Just ask anyone who ever used a
    > knife as
    > > > a screwdriver! Though there's obviously a distinction to be drawn
    > between
    > > > practical and social/psychological utility. But the main point I want
    > to
    > > > make is that, on any broad definition of culture, i.e. not just fine
    > art,
    > > > technology is part of it. That's what the "industrial evolution"
    > thing is
    > > > about, isn't it?
    > > >
    > > > Talking of which, the second instalment of the show we both saw last
    > week
    > > > was on last night, don't know if you caught it, but again, I don't
    > think
    > > > there was one reference to natural resource depletion. Plenty to
    > economic
    > > > motivation, though! And contrasts with social conditions in
    > continental
    > > > Europe, where innovations tended to be viewed as toys for the rich,
    > rather
    > > > than commodities and income generators for the middle class. England
    > > > really was a nation of shopkeepers!
    > > >
    > > > --
    > > > Robin Faichney
    > > >
    > > > ==============================================================This was
    > > > distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > > > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > > > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > > > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    > > >
    > >
    > > ===============================================================
    > > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jun 06 2000 - 12:32:08 BST