RE: Why Europe is so Contrary

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Sun 08 Dec 2002 - 20:34:59 GMT

  • Next message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: Fw: Why Europe is so Contrary ( joe 1)"

    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > >From: Jeremy Bradley <jeremyb@nor.com.au>
    > >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > >To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > >Subject: RE: Why Europe is so Contrary
    > >Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2002 20:31:55 +1100
    > >
    > > >> > Snip......Grant:
    > > >> >> for example, seems to mark the begining and end of the
    > > >> >> dynosaurs. Mitocondrial eve marks the beginning of mankind.
    > > >> >> This way of looking at the universe seems so engrained in our
    > > >> >> nature that it must occupy some deeper place in our makeup
    > > >> >> than a cultural meme.
    > > >> >>
    > > >> >> Grant
    > > >> >>
    > >Jeremy:
    > > >> > I don't think so Grant cos some cultures, mostly ones that we
    > > >> > have defeated, had achieved stability and sustainability within
    > > >> > their environments. These folk view 'development' as
    > > >> > undesirable or bad. For them harmony with the nature that they
    > > >> > found themselves in was the primary goal of existence. In all
    > > >> > cases that I have found, such cultures have narrative
    > > >> > patterning and content which predicates this cultural 'norm'.
    > > >> > That's the short answer. Jeremy
    > > >>
    > >Grant:
    > > >> Not many cultures that I am aware of have achieved this stability
    > > >> with their environment, unless you include the possibility of
    > > >> 'die back' when things are scarce. Most cultures expand to the
    > > >> extent of their resources. If Hitler was not aware of this we
    > > >> would have been spared WWII.
    > > >>
    > >Joe:
    > > >Other examples of enviromnetally suicidal indigenous tribes are the
    > > >ancient Easter Islanders and the Anasazi indians of the American
    > > >southwest. It is a meme and a myth, kinda like the old 'noble
    > > >savage', 'ancient sage' saw, that older cultures were always wiser.
    > > >>
    > >
    > >
    > >Jeremy:
    > >Look Joe, I know that I am a devout environmentalist but the only
    > >culture that I am aware of which could be described as
    > >"environmentally suicidal" is our modern industrial one. Just to
    > >touch the edges, if the 'developing nations' were to 'develop' to the
    > >stage that the affluent West has it would cost us another three
    > >planets worth of resources, and the pollution would have killed us
    > >long before that anyway. Peace, simplicity, and environmental care
    > >are what we need for sustainability. If we could achieve those goals
    > >I would say that we had reached a highly evolved state. Only low
    > >animals foul their surroundings and waste their resources Joe. I am
    > >not saying, "older cultures were always wiser". What I am saying is
    > >that it is a meme and a myth that newer cultures are always wiser.
    > >Jeremy
    > >
    > >
    > Isn't there some sort of underlying theme of "cornucopia" (aka "horn
    > of plenty") at play? People are deluded into thinking there's some
    > beneficient force that ensures Providence and so we need not worry
    > about resources. We should go forth and multiply and utilize nature to
    > its fullest extent. As an example, a patch of unused woods is an
    > eyesore and must be developed and thus become economically viable and
    > fulfil the aesthetic ideal of having been shaped by human hands.
    > Non-grass species of wildflower are "weeds" to be eradicated by some
    > chemical spray or hoe. All non-ornamental species of plant are
    > "inferior" and must be destroyed.
    >
    > Changing gears a little, the laissez faire attitude in economics
    > probably relates (ala Smith's invisible hand) to some sort of
    > Providential cornucopia. That's why economic conservatives probably
    > believe in the "revenue fairy" who sprinkles pixie dust every time
    > taxes are cut so the economy magically "grows", revenues increase and
    > all is well with *our* world.
    >
    > Am I viewing cornucopia and providence in the correct manner?
    >
    This is indeed the 'reluctant lunchbox' theory of patriarchal monotheism; that the planet is a hostile yet inevitably subservient waystation to be used as the faithful wish on their way to their true destination in heaven or paradise.
    >
    > _________________________________________________________________ The
    > new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
    > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun 08 Dec 2002 - 20:36:39 GMT