From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Sun 08 Dec 2002 - 00:44:42 GMT
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: joedees@bellsouth.net
> >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
> >To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
> >Subject: RE: World opinion survey
> >Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 12:16:53 -0600
> >
> > > At 01:06 AM 7/12/02 -0600, you wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Joe's memeset said:
> > > >> >Israel is kinda like the modern Berlin, except, instead of
> > > >> >being a democratic city surrounded by hostile Communist
> > > >> >totalitarian regimes, it is a tiny democratic nation
> > > >> >surrounded by hostile Islamofascist totalitarian regimes.
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Jeremy's memeset's reply:
> > > >> Funny, I thought that their longest boundary was with the
> > > >> Mediteranian Sea. This is followed by Jordan, Egypt, Lebanon
> > > >> and an occupied section of Syria. Of these, the Med is
> > > >> sometimes hostile but as far as I know it is atheistic, Jordan
> > > >> is US friendly, Egypt is moderate, Lebanon (part Christian)
> > > >> just wants peace and quiet and Syria would like the Golan back
> > > >> thanks.
> > > >>
> > >
> > > Joe's memeset replied:
> > > >Many governments in the area, including Iraq and Iran, would like
> > > >to soo Israel disappear. This is also true of many of the
> > > >citizenry in the nations you just named. Weapons come to the
> > > >Gaxa Strip via tunnels from Egypt, and Lebanon is a staging area
> > > >for Hizbullah attacks, with Syria's acquiescence. The Lebanese,
> > > >Egyptian and Syrian media are extremely hostile to Israel, and
> > > >the Jordanian media is not much better.
> > > >>
> > >
> > > Jeremy's memeset again:
> > > OK Joe, I'm catching on now. Your phrase, "surrounded by hostile
> > > Islamofascist
> > > totalitarian regimes", in the way you use it, is more of a
> > > creative
> > > rhetorical style than actual fact. The factual content of your
> > > post, as I see it, is: 1) Fundamentalist Islamic Nation States,
> > > who don't share actual boundaries with Israel (but are threatened
> > > because they are a part of what fundamentalist Jews think of as
> > > the Greater Israel)
> > >
> >As has been said before, the "Greater Israel" canard is a false
> >Islamicist propaganda line, which you seem to have fallen for.
> >
> No. The "Nile to Euphrates" notion might be an Arabist canard. If I'm
> not mistaken, the Revisionist Zionist right wingers and religious
> nationalist tend toward the Greater Israel vision, which mostly
> centers on the West Bank (Judea and Samaria included). Lawry can
> correct me if I'm wrong, but those on the Jabotinskyian Revisionist
> side of Zionism took offense to Britain carving the original Palestine
> mandate into Palestine and Transjordan. This effectively took the East
> Bank out of the picture for the future Judenstaat.
>
> Judea and Samaria are integral to Eretz Yisrael. The Hashemites used
> to have control over the West Bank, before the Soviets egged Nasser on
> with that false report of Israeli troop movements toward the Syrian
> border, setting up a chain of events that resulted in Israel's
> launching a massive pre-emptive blitzkrieg on the Egyptians, wiping
> their air force out before they knew what was happening. > >The fact
> that Israel >returned the Sinai to Egypt and is negotiating to return
> the Golan >Heights to Syria belies the smear. You have obviously been
> infected by >the "Greater Israel" meme. > Will Israel ever give up the
> West Bank? Will she dismantle the settlements, such as begrudgingly
> happened with the Sinai was returned to Egypt, and allow Palestinians
> to erect a full fledged state in all of the West Bank. What would Gush
> Emunim and the religious nationalists think of that move if it were to
> occur?
>
> If you read Avi Shlaim's _The Iron Wall_ you would see that there is a
> Greater Israel vision at play. A "meme" perhaps, but not imaginary.
> This ideological mindset could be one of many factors behind Israeli
> intransigence in regards to the future of the West Bank and its
> Palestinian Arab population.
>
The point still stands that the 'Nile to Euphrates' canard is untrue, and
used as a propaganda justification for Islamicist aggression against
Israel. Some Zionists do indeed want to keep the West bank (to which
they refer as Judea and samaria), but that view is in the minority in
Israel. Most there would support the 'land for peace' trade, complete
with removal of the Jewish settlements and a return of the Golan
Heights to Syria, if their security could be subsequently guaranteed by
a believeable (translation: internationally enforceable) promise of a
cessation of hostilities from all other parties.
> _________________________________________________________________ The
> new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
>
>
> ===============================================================
> This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
> Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
> For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
> see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
>
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun 08 Dec 2002 - 00:46:20 GMT