RE: Primate Rights

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Thu Jun 01 2000 - 11:36:28 BST

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: Primate Rights"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id LAA05619 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 1 Jun 2000 11:38:35 +0100
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745890@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Primate Rights
    Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 11:36:28 +0100 
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    The way I understood it, and I am way out on a limb in the area of primate
    communication (i.e. I'm not basing it on experimental knowledge, just what
    I've heard), was that primates had 'words' for things but not grammar, i.e.
    sentences which conveyed different meanings depending on word order etc.
    etc. Like the other primates Ann mentioned that have specific calls for
    things like snakes and eagles etc.

    If that's wrong I'm prepared to learn otherwise, because it is an important
    issue. I've seen studies (on TV- hey I'm a media scholar, it's my job to
    watch TV rather than read science journals! :-)) that showed that apes in
    the lab can understand grammar, but how would we show them using it in the
    wild anyway, since they don't talk or sign (or do they?).

    I put these things up entirely with the purpose of being enlightened.

    Vincent

    > ----------
    > From: Lawrence H. de Bivort
    > Reply To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 4:17 pm
    > To: 'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'
    > Subject: RE: Primate Rights
    >
    >
    > Vincent noted that "Apes do not spontaneously in the wild develop
    > grammatical language the way they do in the lab" -- I'm somewhat familiar
    > with some of the chimpanze ASL work, carried out in lab environments, but
    > unfamiliar with studies indicating that grammar is absent in the wild. Any
    > citations at and?
    >
    > I wonder why chimpanzes would not have grammar in the wild. Is the
    > suggestion that they 'learn' grammatical construction from their human
    > contacts? By observation of the linguistic activity of the human's around
    > them? If so, this might be even more remarkable than their possession of
    > grammatical abilities, whether in the lab or the wild.
    >
    > - Lawrence
    >
    >
    > |---------------------------------------------|
    > | ESI |
    > | Evolutionary Services Institute |
    > | "Crafting opportunities for a better world" |
    > | 5504 Scioto Road, Bethesda, MD 20816, USA |
    > | (301) 320-3941 |
    > |---------------------------------------------|
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 01 2000 - 11:39:09 BST