Re: What is it good for?

From: Joe E. Dees (joedees@bellsouth.net)
Date: Thu Jun 01 2000 - 07:52:23 BST

  • Next message: Paul marsden: "Re: Cui Bono Chuck?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id HAA04605 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 1 Jun 2000 07:50:33 +0100
    Message-Id: <200006010648.CAA05621@mail5.lig.bellsouth.net>
    From: "Joe E. Dees" <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 01:52:23 -0500
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: What is it good for?
    In-reply-to: <00060107154400.00407@faichney>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12b)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    From: Robin Faichney <robin@faichney.demon.co.uk>
    Organization: Reborn Technology
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: What is it good for?
    Date sent: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 07:10:31 +0100
    Send reply to: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    > As often happens, I thought of a neat answer to something I saw here,
    > long after deleting the message and shutting down the machine.
    >
    > Anyway, for the doubters among us, memetics explains the spread of
    > patterns of behaviour through a population without invoking the
    > subjective spectre of the mind, without involving either consciousness
    > or free will. But don't worry, it doesn't compromise your freedom,
    > because due to non-linearities etc, individual cases will always be
    > too complex to be predicted.
    >
    It is you who doubt your own self- and other-consciousness, Robin,
    and I am beginning to doubt yours as well. But then, It isn't really
    your fault, ayy? Like any mass murderer or saint, scientist,
    mystic, tall-tale-teller or philosopher, you Have to say and do what
    you say and do, regardless of its veracity. I, however, am free to
    critically consider all feasible alternatives, and reject those which
    ineluctably lead to reductio ad absurdum self-contradictions. The
    reason that our future actions canot be absolutely predicted is
    because they have not from the Big Bang been decided (duh!), by
    either a Western Yahveh or an Eastern Karma-Dharma.
    >
    Check out
    http://www.newscientist.com/archive/archive.jsp?id=17094200
    >
    Probability (which cannot coexist with determinism) is at the root
    and heart of mathematics itself, rather than physics alone; IOW,
    uncertainty and undecideability permeate the candidate members a
    subset of which comprise the interlocking system of principles
    grounding reality's possibilities, not just as an epistemological
    limitation (what we can know) but as an ontological one (what can
    and cannot be).
    > --
    > Robin Faichney
    >
    >
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 01 2000 - 07:51:10 BST