Re: What is it good for?

From: Chuck (cpalson@mediaone.net)
Date: Thu Jun 01 2000 - 12:22:19 BST

  • Next message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: Jabbering !"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id RAA07228 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 1 Jun 2000 17:24:21 +0100
    Message-ID: <3936476A.BFADB731@mediaone.net>
    Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2000 12:22:19 +0100
    From: Chuck <cpalson@mediaone.net>
    X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (WinNT; I)
    X-Accept-Language: en
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: What is it good for?
    References: <00060107154400.00407@faichney>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Robin Faichney wrote:

    > As often happens, I thought of a neat answer to something I saw here,
    > long after deleting the message and shutting down the machine.
    >
    > Anyway, for the doubters among us, memetics explains the spread of
    > patterns of behaviour through a population without invoking the
    > subjective spectre of the mind, without involving either consciousness
    > or free will.

    And of course. That's the point of memetics - and why it is so
    unconvincing. I suppose you could imagine that we communicate with each
    other on this listserv in a coma. I must say that sometimes I sense that
    your answers, while not indicating comma, are at least trance-like.

    > But don't worry, it doesn't compromise your freedom,

    I don't worry about such things.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 01 2000 - 17:24:59 BST