Re: Primate Rights

From: Anne (tazzie@bolian.upnaway.com)
Date: Wed May 31 2000 - 13:13:34 BST

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: Primate Rights"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA07607 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 31 May 2000 13:16:41 +0100
    Message-ID: <00ba01bfcaf9$d4632cc0$3b2484d8@default>
    From: "Anne" <tazzie@bolian.upnaway.com>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745889@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    Subject: Re: Primate Rights
    Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 20:13:34 +0800
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    > Thank Ann, very interesting material.
    >
    > I've always been both fascinated by Goodall's work (at Gombi isn't it?)
    and
    > concerned at the same time. Fascinated because of how lengthy
    observations
    > of chimp behaviour has shown some remarkable parallels with human
    behaviour,
    > but concerned because she has a major tendency towards anthropomorphism
    (the
    > chimps have 'names' etc.).

            I"ll answer on these issues, and your following lines at a later
    date!

    > I've said before on this list that I don't buy other animals having
    > cultures, though; pre-cultural behaviours, or proto-cultural behaviours
    > perhaps, but to call these rudimentary behaviours culture I think makes
    the
    > term meaningless.
    >
    > Obviously human culture (and things like religious belief) have to have
    some
    > precedent as they are products of natural selection, and it would indeed
    be
    > strange if we didn't see behaviours approximating human behaviours in
    other
    > animals.
    >
    > Yet both quantitively and qualitatively our behaviours are distinct. Apes
    > do not spontaneously in the wild develop grammatical language the way they
    > do in the lab, and experiments have shown that pigs can use computer
    > joysticks to perform basic tasks as well. Does that mean there should be
    > porcine rights as well?

        Not even worth an answer...

    > Vincent

            I skipped the last section of the article last night, Ive posted it
    now, so you can try to comprehend what goes on in the labs!

    Cheers Anne

         ((The Oregon Regional Primate Research Center: Oline K. Ronnekleiv
    is administering cocaine to pregnant mothers and unborn fetuses. He has
    discovered that chronic cocaine use causes brain damage. (Project number: 5
    P51 RR00163 -38).
         Miles Novy " . . . studies . . . unanesthetized chronically
    catheterized maternal-fetal
    preparations . . . ". He wants to know how hormone levels change during
    pregnancy in rhesus macaques and baboons. (Project number: 5 R37
      HDO6159 -25).

         Washington Regional Primate Research Center: Marnix L. Bosch has
    learned that HIV and SIV have, " . . . important biological differences."
    This was discoverd by infecting rhesus and pigtailed macaques. They were
    infected both orally and rectally. (Project number: 2 P51 RR00166 -36).
         Virginia M. Gunderson has recieved a Scientist Development Award
    to " . . . gain
    expertise. . . [and], . . . acquire the skills to attain her career goals."
    She is injecting chemicals into the brains of very young pigtailed macaques
    to try to induce seizures.

         New England Regional Primate Research Center: Janice H. Kinsey
    designed a database to keep records on the large population of individually
    housed monkeys. She gathered data on the amount of various behaviors such
    as: ". . .pacing, bouncing, rocking, . . . self-biting, grasping, and hair
    pulling." She learned that 10% of the center's monkeys bite themselves.
    [Sometimes they chew off fingers, tail tips and chew holes in their arms
    that require veterinary care.] ( PN # 5 P51 RR00168 -36).
         Alyssa Rulf Fountain, studying self-injurious behavior (SIB) such as
    self-biting, reports that,
    ". . . the causes are largely unknown." ( PN # 5 P51 RR00168 -36).
         Both of these studies above are ongoing, but as early as 1990
    researchers had found that even a small hole between cages of individually
    caged monkeys which allowed them to touch each other stopped most of this
    behavior. Ms. Fountain's assertion notwithstanding, the cause of SIB has
    been well known for years: Most non-human primates are more social than
    humans and isolating them causes insanity. (See D. Blum, The Monkey Wars,
    pg. 191).

         Wisconsin Regional Primate Research Center: Christopher L. Coe says
    that, "Prior research at our laboratory has determined that stressful
    events experienced by the pregnant female monkey can affect her fetus . . ."
    ... Now he wants to know, " . . . whether the absence of breast milk and its
    soluble immune products exacerbates the effects of prenatal disturbance."
     PN # R01 MH41659 -12).
         In a similar study at the Wisconsin center, researchers are scarring
    the amygdala (a deep brain structure) of female monkeys to induce a
    permanent state of fear. They want to know whether such stress can affect a
    baby born to such an afflicted mother.

         Tulane Regional Primate Research Center: Margaret R. Clark is working
    to enlarge the breeding colony of rhesus macaques. She wishes the facility
    to produce an additional 150 babies a year. She says, " . . . infants will
    be removed [from their mothers and all adult monkeys] within three days of
    birth . . . Management practices will maximize the psychological well-being
    of the animals." ( PN # 5 P51 RR00164 -34, $103,241).
         Gamal M. Ghoniem is implanting vascular cuffs around the neck of the
    bladder of rhesus macaques. A lead to this cuff runs out of the monkeys'
    bodies and allows him to squeeze off the neck of the bladder while the
    monkeys attempt to urinate. He has found that monkeys whose bladder necks
    are most tightly closed take longer to pee than those with less obstruction.
    ( PN # 5 P51 RR00164 -36).

         Yerkes Regional Primate Research Center: Leonard L. Howell has learned
    that monkeys trained to drink caffeine will self-administer lower doses than
    monkeys trained to receive intravenous injections. ( PN # 5 P 51
     RR00165 -37).
         Opendra Narayan has successfully developed a cross between SIV and
    HIV-1. He reports that this new virus he has created is, "highly
    pathogenic in pigtailed macaques." He does not mention whether it would be
    harmful to humans. ( PN # 5 P51 RR00165 -37).
         Margarete Tigges is sewing the eyelids shut on newborn infants. ( PN
    # 5 P51 RR00165 -37).

         California Regional Primate Research Center: David G. Amaral is using
    chemical means to permanently disconnect the amygdalas from the rest of
    the brain in male monkeys. He wants to know whether they will still be able
    to communicate with facial expression. He says this will help us understand
    criminality and psychopathic behavior in humans. ( PN # 5 P51
      RR00169 -36).
         William Gilbert is ligating (tying shut) esophagi and catheterizing the
    tracheas of fetus rhesus macaques. He characterizes this as chronic
    catheterization which means that these babies inside their mothers have
    these tubes in them for days or months on end. ( PN # 5 RR000169 -36).

         What these examples teach is that the federally funded primate research
    centers around the United States have little regard for or understanding of
    the animals they experiment on. Any abuse is allowed in the name of
    Science. Studies routinely repeat experiments that have been done on
    humans. Monkeys are disposed of as if they are broken equipment.
         Every center has received warnings about the condition of the animals'
    housing. Every center keeps monkeys in isolation. Every center receives
    over 10 million dollars a year. Expansion is underway around the country.
    Every law to protect and enhance the life of these animals has been heavily
    lobbied against by the biomedical community.
         The researchers say this work is important because we learn about
    humans since monkeys and apes are so like us, but at the same time they say
    we should not be concerned over the torment these animals suffer because
    they are so unlike us.
         Biomedical researchers have made the same arguments and done similar
    things to minorities throughout history. The research taking place at the
    NIH Regional Primate Research Centers is just more of the same. Its root
    cause is the bigotry that is always associated with unbridled hubris. Only
    when people speak out will it end. ))

    > >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 13:17:14 BST