Re: Thoughts and Perceptions

From: John Wilkins (wilkins@wehi.edu.au)
Date: Fri Apr 19 2002 - 03:25:34 BST

  • Next message: Richard Brodie: "RE: Thoughts and Perceptions"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id DAA24995 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 19 Apr 2002 03:31:26 +0100
    Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 12:25:34 +1000
    Subject: Re: Thoughts and Perceptions
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
    From: John Wilkins <wilkins@wehi.edu.au>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
    In-Reply-To: <005801c1e72a$df4ea340$5324f4d8@teddace>
    Message-Id: <BA49DF38-533C-11D6-90FB-003065B4D1F0@wehi.edu.au>
    X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.481)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Friday, April 19, 2002, at 08:46 AM, Dace wrote:

    > Hi Wade,
    >  
    > You're absolutely justified in standing up for the distinction between
    > concept and reality.  Even if Bill S. is right that the concept of
    > gravity will one day be dismissed by physics, this doesn't change the
    > fact that our current concept refers to something real.  But factuality i
    > sn't identical to actuality.  A fact is a concept that happens to be true,
    > at least in the context of our general conceptual schema, which is
    > always subject to revision. 
    .....
    There is a classical error that I have called the Abstraction Fallacy
    before - I found a beautiful quote in Boethius (5thC):

            "It is clear... that this happened to him [Epicurus], and to
            others, because they thought, through inexperience in logical
            argument, that everything they comprehended in reasoning
            occurred also in things themselves. " [_Second
            Commentary of Porphyry's Isagoge_, Bk I, sect 2]

    >  
    > Looks like the same semantic blind-spot that tripped you up last summer
    > on "belief."
    >  
    > Ted
    >  
    >  
    > On Thursday, April 18, 2002, at 11:08 , Grant Callaghan wrote:
    >
    > > What actually happened was fact at every stage of the experiment.  The
    > > concept just guided the experiment.
    >
    > You betcha.
    >
    > > What the word "fact" means is the same as with any other word: it
    > > depends on what it is being used to mean.
    >
    > "Yes, that is what the _word_ for fact does," said the White Knight.
    >
    > - - Wade
    >

    --
    John S Wilkins
    Head, Communication Services
    The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
    Parkville, Victoria, Australia
    

    ===============================This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 19 2002 - 03:43:08 BST