Re: Technology vs. culture

From: Chuck Palson (cpalson@mediaone.net)
Date: Fri May 19 2000 - 18:34:08 BST

  • Next message: Chuck Palson: "Re: Technology vs. culture"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id XAA17180 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 19 May 2000 23:31:29 +0100
    Message-ID: <39257B10.F8037299@mediaone.net>
    Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 18:34:08 +0100
    From: Chuck Palson <cpalson@mediaone.net>
    X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (WinNT; I)
    X-Accept-Language: en
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Technology vs. culture
    References: <NBBBIIDKHCMGAIPMFFPJOEHKENAA.richard@brodietech.com> <3925BE02.4F13FAE8@pacbell.net>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Bill Spight wrote:

    > Dear Richard,
    >
    > > Exceptions don't prove rules.
    > > They DISprove rules, don't they? I've heard this phrase used before and
    > > never understood what it could mean.
    >
    > It's a good example of meme mutation.
    >
    > "Prove" and "probe" are cognates. An exception probes the rule,
    > it tests it. The meaning of the phrase has altered over time.

    That's very interesting. I do, however, have a problem calling it a mutation.
    Mutations are accidents of the system - like a stray UV ray mutates a gene. I
    don't see how this is necessary a random process -- it sounds like it could
    have been a deliberate mataphorical process - of using a word metaphorically
    to describe another event. Also, I am a bit confused about what altered. Are
    you saying that probe altered into prove?
    How would memetics see this differently from etymology - is there a
    difference?

    > Nowadays it is used as a defense of a general proposition (the
    > rule). Just because a generalization has exceptions does not
    > disprove it.

    Do you mean "necessarily disprove." -- because an exception *can* disprove a
    rule if it doesn't deepen it. That is, if it is more than merely an apparent
    exception.

    > Best,
    >
    > Bill

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 19 2000 - 23:32:30 BST