Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA02592 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 11 Mar 2002 13:26:45 GMT Message-ID: <002f01c1c8ff$8ebd9790$5828000a@lmi.org> From: "Jim Forbes-chatpress-cnc" <jforbes@chatpress.com> To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Subject: relationships among memetics, semiotics, and Kuhnian view of science? Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 08:20:45 -0500 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002C_01C1C8D5.A44C7D30" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
There are relatively obvious potential relationships among memetics, semiotics, and Thomas Kuhn's description of how scientific theories are created and sustained.
Before putting a lot of energy into describing these relationships I was wondering if any of this has been a previous subject of discussion or if there are previous articles in the area. Like to avoid reinventing the wheel.
Thanks,
Jim Forbes
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 11 2002 - 13:37:11 GMT