Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA02660 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 11 Mar 2002 13:47:35 GMT User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022 Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 08:42:03 -0500 Subject: Re: relationships among memetics, semiotics, and Kuhnian view of science? From: William Benzon <bbenzon@mindspring.com> To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Message-ID: <B8B21E5A.FF9F%bbenzon@mindspring.com> In-Reply-To: <002f01c1c8ff$8ebd9790$5828000a@lmi.org> Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="MS_Mac_OE_3098680923_14601121_MIME_Part" Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
on 3/11/02 8:20 AM, Jim Forbes-chatpress-cnc at jforbes@chatpress.com wrote:
There are relatively obvious potential relationships among memetics,
semiotics, and Thomas Kuhn's description of how scientific theories are
created and sustained.
Before putting a lot of energy into describing these relationships I was
wondering if any of this has been a previous subject of discussion or if
there are previous articles in the area. Like to avoid reinventing the
wheel.
Thanks,
Jim Forbes
I've said a bit about cultural evolution and the notion of a paradigm in:
Benzon, W. L. (1996). "Culture as an Evolutionary Arena." Journal of Social
and Evolutionary Systems 19(4): 321-362.
Also some of the discussion in my book on music, Beethoven's Anvil, is
relevant.
BTW, there's a review of Beethoven's Anvil in Nature:
David Juritz (2002), Notes on a Cultural Theme, Nature 416, p. 19, 07 March.
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 11 2002 - 13:58:01 GMT