RE: Rumsfeld Says He May Drop New Office of Influence

From: Joachim Maier (jakemaier@adelphia.net)
Date: Wed Feb 27 2002 - 12:09:10 GMT

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "RE: Breath Mints: A Hot War for America's Cool Mouths"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA05320 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 27 Feb 2002 12:14:38 GMT
    Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020226191540.00bad808@localhost>
    X-Sender: jakemaier/pop.abs.adelphia.net@localhost
    X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
    Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 07:09:10 -0500
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    From: Joachim Maier <jakemaier@adelphia.net>
    Subject: RE: Rumsfeld Says He May Drop New Office of Influence
    In-Reply-To: <NEBBKOADILIOKGDJLPMAOEAGCMAA.debivort@umd5.umd.edu>
    References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020226164241.02d40af8@localhost>
    Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Hi Lawrence,

    I agree with you that it is a great help to have a possibility to bounce back some ideas. And more power to you if you use the list to check out  ideas before applying them to real world situations.

    Yes, I imagined you would not be a Bush voter, and even so I would be surprised, I might be wrong on this.

    I agree with Grants posting.
    Stupid and intelligent are relative terms, not absolutes. Any administration in any government will be relatively more or less stupid or intelligent than any other. The policy a government turns out is the result of input by hundreds, if not thousands, of individuals with differing goals and opinions . . .
    Grant

    Even so I do appreciate you attitude, I'm a bit worried that a certain righteousness shines through your words here. I just do not know if what you see as betterment is the same as what I or all the other people you influence see as betterment.
    And yes, I do think our efforts, whether we are in or out of government,
    should be orinted toward betterment of the human condition. I'm not
    interested in anything else.

    Lawrence

    There is even a more critical issue, and that has to do with Grants remarks. I have heard and believe we humans can at the most handle 3 independent thoughts in our mind at any one time. With the uncountable issues out there in the political world, I would have appreciated if you would have included as your first the notion not to do any harm.

    Joachim
    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://cfpm.org/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 27 2002 - 12:24:48 GMT