Re: Fwd: Did language drive society or vice versa?

From: Bill Spight (bspight@pacbell.net)
Date: Tue May 16 2000 - 18:03:16 BST

  • Next message: daniella: "Re: Central questions of memetics"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id PAA00712 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 17 May 2000 15:09:46 +0100
    Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 10:03:16 -0700
    From: Bill Spight <bspight@pacbell.net>
    Subject: Re: Fwd: Did language drive society or vice versa?
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Message-id: <39217F54.FAA8EED2@pacbell.net>
    Organization: Saybrook Graduate School
    X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en]C-PBI-NC404  (Win95; I)
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
    X-Accept-Language: ja,en
    References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D31CEB192@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Dear Vincent (and Chuck),

    Vincent:
    > Oh yes, I'm not saying we don't have a probability capacity in our brain,
    > only that it isn't "tuned" to cope with huge expanses of probability.
    > That's why the probability of the emergence of language from natural
    > selection seems improbable to many people (in the way that theists find it
    > difficult to deal with the idea of the universe coming from nothing), and
    > requires explanation.

    Chuck:
    >> However, what is interesting is that we DO have an
    > > inborn
    > > ability to understand probabilities and act on them. But it all depends on how
    > > they are stated. It's the same problem as understanding logical constructs that
    > > I just wrote about in another posting. The brain has to get the information in a
    > > way that approximates how it got it under ancestral conditions.

    You both make good points.

    Related to what Vincent is saying is the underestimation of the
    occurrence of coincidences. For instance, most people would take
    an even money bet against whether 2 out of 30 randomly chosen
    people have the same birthday. In fact, the break even point is
    around 23 people, IIRC. :-)

    As for the probability that some species somewhere sometime would
    have something we would call language, given the Big Bang and
    billions of years, I wouldn't hazard a guess. ;-)

    Best,

    Bill

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 17 2000 - 16:12:01 BST