RE: Fwd: Did language drive society or vice versa?

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Fri May 12 2000 - 13:02:53 BST

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: Fwd: Did language drive society or vice versa?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA00814 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 12 May 2000 13:04:40 +0100
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D31CEB185@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Fwd: Did language drive society or vice versa?
    Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 13:02:53 +0100
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    I don't want to posit this as a serious contribution to this discussion, but
    you've given us a brilliant example of a meme we all know- the chicken and
    the egg conundrum. Does anyone have any clever answers to that? (or rather
    why does it persist?).

    Mine answer to the question itself would be that eggs came first, because
    eggs appeared before chickens evolved. Why it persists? Well I don't know-
    another useless meme?

    > ----------
    > From: Bruce Jones
    > Reply To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2000 4:50 pm
    > To: 'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'
    > Cc: Kevin O'Connor (KMO)
    > Subject: RE: Fwd: Did language drive society or vice versa?
    >
    > Getting back to the original discussion ... Did language drive society or
    > vice versa?
    >
    > I think we all agree that if we could not communicate we could not have
    > society.
    >
    > Society lives and dies based on shared ideals, ideas, enterprise and
    > commitment. Take away or never have some form of communication
    > (minimalist
    > definition) and none of this is possible.
    >
    > There are different languages and regional differences within those
    > languages leading to linguistic groups and sub-groups ... each has a
    > different agenda or background or specialty defined and expressed by their
    > language. Therefore IMHO you can't have one without the other.
    >
    > Which came first the chicken or the egg?
    >
    >
    > Bruce
    >
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 12 2000 - 13:05:05 BST