Re: new line: what's the point?

From: J. R. Molloy (jr@shasta.com)
Date: Sun Mar 05 2000 - 18:52:55 GMT

  • Next message: Joe E. Dees: "Re: new line: what's the point?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA13013 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 5 Mar 2000 18:46:48 GMT
    Message-ID: <00da01bf86d4$19c20e40$57bc473f@j-r-molloy>
    From: "J. R. Molloy" <jr@shasta.com>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: Re: new line: what's the point?
    Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2000 10:52:55 -0800
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    From: Wade T.Smith <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
    >The scientist needs
    >to be, first and foremost, a person without memes. The scientific method
    >is a structure designed to mightily eliminate any effects of the observer.

    Science may operate outside of memetics, but scientists remain susceptible to
    memes.
    A completely unbiased and meme-free scientist would surpass all previous
    enlightened masters, and would probably be completely ignored.

    >Is memetics a scientific method to study culture? IMHO, it should be.

    The "should be" meme is powerful. Memetics does not constitute a separate
    scientific method, because there is only one scientific method. But memetics
    does constitute a practical field of science.

    >Because the meme is that mechanism in the mind that goes, "No, no, _this_
    >is what I mean, not that."

    There may be a particular meme for "No, no, _this_ is what I mean, not that" but
    it is not *the* meme. It is only one of many.

    >That this sort of explanatory communication can take place unconsciously
    >_and_ consciously, well, I accept that. But it is memetic to impart, not
    >simply to import.

    It is as rhetorical to invoke solipsism as it is to imbue communication with
    definitions masquerading as explanations.

    Cheers,

    --J. R.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 05 2000 - 18:47:22 GMT