Re: new line: what's the point?

From: J. R. Molloy (jr@shasta.com)
Date: Sun Mar 05 2000 - 18:37:08 GMT

  • Next message: J. R. Molloy: "Re: new line: what's the point?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA13008 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 5 Mar 2000 18:46:43 GMT
    Message-ID: <00d901bf86d4$191bbc20$57bc473f@j-r-molloy>
    From: "J. R. Molloy" <jr@shasta.com>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: Re: new line: what's the point?
    Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2000 10:37:08 -0800
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    >robin said:
    >
    >My point is this: given all the existing concepts, such as meaning, and the
    whole semiotic toolbag, what
    >purpose does the meme concept serve? What place is there for a "selfish"
    replicator in a world of
    >consciously communicating individual minds? I thought memetics was an
    alternative scenario.
    >Otherwise,why bother with memes at all?

    The meme concept is useful in that it helps to clarify issues and to understand
    the contagious nature of thoughts and the infectious quality of ideology.
    Consequently, by correlating memes to genes, we can see how mass socio-genic
    illness can occur, and how we might cure or avoid it.

    Cheers,

    --J. R.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Mar 05 2000 - 18:46:50 GMT