Re: Monkeys stone herdsman in Kenya

From: Mark M. Mills (mmills@htcomp.net)
Date: Fri Mar 03 2000 - 22:56:35 GMT

  • Next message: Joe E. Dees: "Re: Monkeys stone herdsman in Kenya"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id WAA08417 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 3 Mar 2000 22:58:11 GMT
    Message-ID: <B0000481663@htcompmail.htcomp.net>
    X-Sender: mmills@pop3.htcomp.net
    X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0
    Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 17:56:35 -0500
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    From: "Mark M. Mills" <mmills@htcomp.net>
    Subject: Re: Monkeys stone herdsman in Kenya
    In-Reply-To: <200003031810.NAA20229@mail2.lig.bellsouth.net>
    References: <B0000472580@htcompmail.htcomp.net> <1260058958-17555999@smtp.clarityconnect.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Joe,

    At 12:13 PM 3/3/00 -0600, you wrote:

    >A behavior is a meme only if it admits of variations or evolutions or
    >mutations and is not the same species-wide, and if the distinctions
    >are essential ones, i.e. ones which change the signification or
    >intention of the behavior in question and thus could not be
    >circumscribed by instinct, and if it is transmitted/received between
    >individuals by communicational (not genetic) means.

    This is fairly close to the published Gatherer definition.
    http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit/1998/vol2/gatherer_d.html In particular,
    they both say that a behavior can be a meme. As I pointed out before, this
    is one of two published usages of the term meme. The other is Lynch's.
    http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit/1998/vol2/lynch_a.html

    It seems to me that your mention of mutation poses problems for the
    Gatherer definition. Mutation, as generally understood, is "a sudden,
    apparently abnormal change or alteration in a genetically determined
    structure." This alludes to the genotype-phenotype concept. For a meme to
    'mutate' there must be a genotype. If the behavior is a meme, what is the
    genotype?

    Blackmore, a subscriber to the Gatherer meme definition, dismisses
    genotype-phenotype issues in Meme Machine. By dismissing this, she burns
    any bridges she might have had to evolutionary science, but that doesn't
    seem to bother her. As could be expected, the Science and Nature magazines
    published scathing reviews of the book.

    I'm interested in relating mutation to cultural change. I just don't think
    the Gatherer definition particularly helpful.

    I much prefer the Lynch definition.

    MEME (Lynch)
    A memory item, or portion of an organism's neurally-stored information,
    identified using the abstraction system of the observer, whose
    instantiation depended critically on causation by prior instantiation of
    the same memory item in one or more other organisms' nervous systems.

    Except for the notion that behavior = meme, this fits your criteria pretty
    well. Behavior has become phenotypic. Your list of criteria can then be
    used to test a behavior for infering the existence of an underlying meme in
    the subject's neural system. The genotype-phenotype model is honored and
    bridges can be built to existing evolutionary theory.

    I'll be interested to hear the problems you find with the Lynch definition.

    Mark

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 03 2000 - 22:58:19 GMT