Re: memetics-digest V1 #130

From: Joe E. Dees (joedees@bellsouth.net)
Date: Mon Feb 28 2000 - 19:53:11 GMT

  • Next message: Joe E. Dees: "Re: memetics-digest V1 #130"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA07917 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 28 Feb 2000 19:50:44 GMT
    Message-Id: <200002281949.OAA12340@mail2.lig.bellsouth.net>
    From: "Joe E. Dees" <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:53:11 -0600
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: memetics-digest V1 #130
    In-reply-to: <00022708133801.00404@faichney>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12b)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    From: Robin Faichney <robin@faichney.demon.co.uk>
    Organization: Reborn Technology
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: memetics-digest V1 #130
    Date sent: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 19:05:16 +0000
    Send reply to: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    > That's what you get for sending email off before you're fully awake in the
    > morning -- I should have added at the end of that message, which I hope will
    > immediately precede this one in your incoming email folder:
    >
    > Just as one meme is differently encoded in different brains, but encoded
    > nevertheless, so meaning is not uniformly, syntactically encoded in language,
    > but is surely encoded there even so. And the main (only?) key to decoding it,
    > once the syntax has been handled, is context. We might surmise that context,
    > in some sense, is also the key for memes.
    >
    Meaning is a contextual thing. The concept of a single stand-alone
    meaning is nonsensical; meanings are the meanings they are,
    rather than other meanings, because they are distinguishable from
    neighboring meanings in the gestalt matrix of language (the
    semiotic web) by means of comparison and contrast. The number
    5 can also be coded as 4 + 1 or 3 + 2 without the quantity differring
    at all. Of course there are many distinct ways for language to be
    used to represent the same referents, or what's a synonym for?
    > --
    > Robin Faichney
    >
    >
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 28 2000 - 19:50:50 GMT