Re: What are memes made of?

From: Joe E. Dees (joedees@bellsouth.net)
Date: Mon Feb 28 2000 - 19:16:22 GMT

  • Next message: Joe E. Dees: "Re: memetics-digest V1 #130"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA07807 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 28 Feb 2000 19:13:50 GMT
    Message-Id: <200002281912.OAA04544@mail2.lig.bellsouth.net>
    From: "Joe E. Dees" <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 13:16:22 -0600
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: What are memes made of?
    In-reply-to: <00022818572500.00509@faichney>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12b)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    From: Robin Faichney <robin@faichney.demon.co.uk>
    Organization: Reborn Technology
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: What are memes made of?
    Date sent: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 18:46:30 +0000
    Send reply to: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    > On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Joe E. Dees wrote:
    > >>
    > >> I still don't understand why memes should have meaning -- the significance of
    > >> significance, if you like, for memetics. I'm really not questioning meaning in
    > >> general terms -- how could we do without it??? But what, precisely, is the
    > >> place of meaning _in memetics_?
    > >>
    > >Meaning is the content of the communication. Form bereft of
    > >content can have no independent existence in a communication
    > >any more than content can have independent of form, just as there
    > >can be neither semantics purified of syntax nor syntactics purifies
    > >of semantics. There must be (1) coding and (2) the encoded for
    > >any transmission/reception to occur; SOMETHING must be
    > >communicated - an empty communication is a contradiction in
    > >terms, so without it, there is nothing to be memetically multiplied
    > >through dissemination.
    >
    > Up to that last clause, you were talking about communication, not memetics.
    > Then you claim that meaning is "memetically multiplied through dissemination".
    > Does that mean just that it's communicated, or is it saying something more?
    >
    Without communication, there can be no memetics, for it is by
    means of communication that memes replicate. What is
    necessary for communication is necessary for memetics.
    Memetic multiplication is effected by means of dissemination,
    which is communication to multiple receivers.
    >
    > >Meaning is also what undergoes mutation and evolution in the individual mind.
    >
    > Isn't it memes that mutate and evolve? What, precisely, is the relationship
    > between meaning and memes in your scheme?
    >
    Memes are concatenations of meanings which, due to their
    usefulness, truth, or other factors, replicate between minds.
    Memes are meanings that stick in our heads, and evolve to
    become ever stickier.
    > --
    > Robin Faichney
    >
    >
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 28 2000 - 19:13:53 GMT