Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id XAA02206 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 25 Feb 2000 23:22:24 GMT Message-ID: <B0000256794@htcompmail.htcomp.net> X-Sender: mmills@pop3.htcomp.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0 Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 18:21:14 -0500 To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk From: "Mark M. Mills" <mmills@htcomp.net> Subject: Re: Monkeys stone herdsman in Kenya In-Reply-To: <200002251837.NAA16568@mail4.lig.bellsouth.net> References: <3.0.5.32.20000311115614.007f9ea0@rongenet.sk.ca> <200002241956.OAA07014@mail3.lig.bellsouth.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Joe,
At 12:41 PM 2/25/00 -0600, you wrote:
> Who would
>assert, for instance, that a band of baboons throwing rocks at
>another band of baboons trying to drink water at their watering hole
>comprised culture?
Why not?
> The two situations, however, are for all
>practical purposes identical.
Right. We have a host of anthropological work which painstakingly
describes subtle differences in 'human water hole attack' strategies. As
you say, this monkey attack and human variants are practically identical
situations. I see no reason to avoid using the term culture here.
Mark
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 25 2000 - 23:22:30 GMT