Re: memetics-digest V1 #130

From: Robin Faichney (robin@faichney.demon.co.uk)
Date: Wed Feb 23 2000 - 17:56:32 GMT

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "RE: What are memes made of?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA25470 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 23 Feb 2000 18:03:55 GMT
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@faichney.demon.co.uk>
    Organization: Reborn Technology
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: memetics-digest V1 #130
    Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 17:56:32 +0000
    X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.21]
    Content-Type: text/plain
    References: <200002222345.SAA27474@mail3.lig.bellsouth.net>
    Message-Id: <00022318023202.00570@faichney>
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, Joe E. Dees wrote:
    >> OK, forget the bit about individual words. But please explain why semantics
    >> cannot be considered encoded in language, and how, if it is not encoded,
    >> meaning gets conveyed from sender to receiver.
    >>
    >Of course semantics is encoded, but that does not negate
    >semantics itself as a necessary and essential component of
    >memesis.

    I'm not familiar with "memesis". But I think you should consider the
    possibility that the major difference between us is semantic -- that I mean
    something different from "meme" and "memetics" than you do. The difference,
    I'd suggest, is very simply this: you view the meme as an item of intentional
    information, whereas I see it as an item of physical information. I don't want
    to "negate semantics itself" -- I consider it essential! But not to memetics,
    which is about pieces of information that replicate regardless of our
    perceptions and intentions. That does not invalidate these, it just means
    memetics is about something else! (Or at least at the fundamental level it is,
    though it can be built up, with other components, to the level at which we
    consciously operate, just as atoms can in principle be built up into tables and
    chairs.)

    --
    Robin Faichney
    

    ===============================This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 23 2000 - 18:04:28 GMT