Re:Meaning in memetics

From: Robin Faichney (robin@faichney.demon.co.uk)
Date: Thu Feb 17 2000 - 16:57:27 GMT

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re:Meaning in memetics"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id RAA11023 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 17 Feb 2000 17:21:35 GMT
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@faichney.demon.co.uk>
    Organization: Reborn Technology
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re:Meaning in memetics
    Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 16:57:27 +0000
    X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.21]
    Content-Type: text/plain
    References: <000a01bf77f8$c785e960$fe00bed4@default>
    Message-Id: <00021717001503.00639@faichney>
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    I'm replying to this because it's specifically addressed to me, but:

    On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, Kenneth Van Oost wrote:
    >>Robin,
    >
    >Do you remerber discussion list 31.01.2000
    >I wrote,
    ><That is,our genetic build up carries in itself the neurological representation of
    >f.e. being a teacher and/or the will/the need to become teachers or the pressure
    >to force our children to become teachers.That info is in my view,indeed the me-
    >me!?>
    >
    >Now,forget the genetic build up_lets focus on the rest of the text.
    >
    >Alex Rousso/Dennett quote) 15/02/2000
    >wrote,thus the meme is primarily a ' semantic ' classification.
    >
    >Thus a ' meaning ' classification!
    >
    >That is what I meant when I wrote that not only the genes pass on their genetic
    >info but also the neurological representations of what is encoded in the gene!
    >
    >It is the ' information ' // ' the meaning ' (genetical directed or not) to be a teacher/
    >to become a teacher that is important.
    >
    >It is the 'semantic meaning ' (then in my view a somatic imprint) which gives in return understanding/definition/belief/desire/hope...
    >
    >Despite the genes,can you agree!?

    I suspect I would not agree, but I can't be sure, because I really can't make
    out what you're trying to say here. Are you interested in
    genetic/memetic determinism? Or is your point something else altogether?

    --
    Robin Faichney
    

    ===============================This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 17 2000 - 17:22:06 GMT