Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id RAA11028 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 17 Feb 2000 17:21:36 GMT From: Robin Faichney <robin@faichney.demon.co.uk> Organization: Reborn Technology To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk Subject: Re:Meaning in memetics Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 16:53:50 +0000 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.21] Content-Type: text/plain References: <000a01bf772e$201aee20$ac0dbed4@default> Message-Id: <00021716561002.00639@faichney> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, Kenneth Van Oost wrote:
>><intentionalities are necessarily involved in memetics>
>
>Correct me if I am wrong (I dont't quite follow the discussion though) but doesn't
>mean (there we are!!) intentionallity also on purpose/wilful/premeditated!?
No, it doesn't. You should have followed the discussion. Isn't it archived on
the JoM-EMIT site? The relevant posts have "Intentionality" in the subject
line.
>And please,gentlemen,stop nagging at eachother! This is a discussion-list,project
>your ideological hates on something outside this list...we have work to do if we
>ever will find the foundations of memetics.
I, for one, have resolved to be more gentlemanly. :-)
-- Robin Faichney===============================This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 17 2000 - 17:22:08 GMT