Re: Wilson on memes

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Sat Feb 16 2002 - 00:36:27 GMT

  • Next message: Keith Henson: "Re: speaking of science fiction" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id AAA26213 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 16 Feb 2002 00:41:43 GMT
Subject: Re: Wilson on memes
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 19:36:27 -0500
x-sender: wsmith1@camail.harvard.edu
x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-Id: <20020216003610.E95321FD45@camail.harvard.edu>
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    Hi Keith Henson -

    >Personally I think that attempts to give exact definitions are a waste of
    >time. If you get to the stage of modeling or even thought experiments, it
    >is clear from the model or the math what you are doing.

    That seems perfectly self-consistent.

    And there are several models. I'm not a mathematician, but, is there one
    that shows a meme is a requirement, or that models human behavior
    successfully because of its inclusion? Or are there merely experimental
    models that use a meme (of whatever definition) as a constant somehow?

    Or is there one that makes a meme an obvious derivation?

    Again, IMHO, there is not, unless the meme is behavioral.

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 16 2002 - 01:33:27 GMT