RE: ply to Grant

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Tue Feb 12 2002 - 16:35:10 GMT

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: ply to Grant"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id QAA15187 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 12 Feb 2002 16:42:50 GMT
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3102A6D248@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: ply to Grant
    Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 16:35:10 -0000
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    X-Filter-Info: UoS MailScan 0.1 [D 1]
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

            <Vincent, correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think the quote in
    line one
    > above is mine. But even if it was, what difference does a single word
    > make
    > in a long conversation? No one here is writing these snippets for
    > publication -- I don't think. A lot of what is written is carelessly
    > tossed around on the spur of the moment. Your objection to the use of
    > "we" that may include you is duely noted and will be avoided by me in the
    > future. Does that solve the problem for you? I can't even remember what
    > we were talking about when the incident occurred and it doesn't seem worth
    > the
    > effort of tracing it back to its beginnings.>
    >
            It wasn't that long ago, and we were talking about the "great"
    innnovators and cultural change, based on your initial claim that those
    innovators determined the cultures that followed in the wake of new
    technologies. When I challenged this assertion you used the phrase 'we see
    if differently' implying the you had the support of others. When I asked
    exactly who you meant by 'we' you said, rather confusingly, you meant you
    and I. Such things are particularly relevant if you're going to offer
    appeals to authority to support your views, even in a discursive, non-peer
    reviewed environment like this list. Still, I don't want to come across as
    a pedant ('too late!' the gallery cries!) so if you don't want your just-so
    stories about the wonders of global capitalism to be challenged, then we can
    agree to drop the subject.

            Vincent

    -- 
    The University of Stirling is a university established in Scotland by
    charter at Stirling, FK9 4LA.  Privileged/Confidential Information may
    be contained in this message.  If you are not the addressee indicated
    in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such
    person), you may not disclose, copy or deliver this message to anyone
    and any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
    prohibited and may be unlawful.  In such case, you should destroy this
    message and kindly notify the sender by reply email.  Please advise
    immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email
    for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and other
    information in this message that do not relate to the official
    business of the University of Stirling shall be understood as neither
    given nor endorsed by it.
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 12 2002 - 16:52:09 GMT