RE: Words and memes: Memes and religion/cults

From: Keith Henson (hkhenson@cogeco.ca)
Date: Sat Feb 09 2002 - 18:41:51 GMT

  • Next message: Keith Henson: "Re: Meta-memes?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA03356 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 9 Feb 2002 18:45:19 GMT
    Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020209133133.03564ec0@pop.cogeco.ca>
    X-Sender: hkhenson@pop.cogeco.ca
    X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
    Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2002 13:41:51 -0500
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    From: Keith Henson <hkhenson@cogeco.ca>
    Subject: RE: Words and memes: Memes and religion/cults
    In-Reply-To: <NEBBKOADILIOKGDJLPMAEENACKAA.debivort@umd5.umd.edu>
    References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020209023730.0355b2f0@pop.cogeco.ca>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    At 08:55 AM 09/02/02 -0500, you wrote:
    >My sense is that memes are value neutral. Memetics may help explain HOW
    >systems of beliefs, e.g. religions, spread, but it does not favor such
    >spread any more than it favors the spread of anti- or non-relgious beliefs.

    I would put it that memetics (study of memes) tends to be value neutral,
    but I see nothing at all wrong with putting highly negative values on memes
    that damage people and positive values on memes that support the things we
    generally consider to be good.

    >I _can_ see how figures in authority over systems that are largely
    >belief-based would worry about the field of memetics, as it rather
    >undermines the notion that beliefs are purely linked to truth and reality or
    >some non-human authority, such as gods or religious tomes.

    The concept of replicating cultural element has been around at least 35
    years and the word meme used for over 25. " memetics OR meme" limited to
    English in Google returns 144,000 hits. This area of knowledge may not
    excite a lot of opposition. At least the history so far suggest that.

    >Memes, as instruments of transmission of beliefs, are neutral in the same
    >way that a hammer is: they can be used for purposes or effects that we might
    >consider good, or bad but it has more to do with the designer and wielders
    >of the contents of the meme than its intrinsic existence as the medium of
    >transmission.

    So far as I know memetics has not been used to create a meme or resulting
    social movement for either good or evil.

    Keith Henson

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 09 2002 - 18:54:29 GMT