Re: Words and memes

From: Ray Recchia (rrecchia@mail.clarityconnect.com)
Date: Mon Feb 04 2002 - 01:52:32 GMT

  • Next message: Grant Callaghan: "Re: Abstractism"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id CAA12729 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 4 Feb 2002 02:00:02 GMT
    Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.0.20020203204951.00a2d170@mail.clarityconnect.com>
    X-Sender: rrecchia@mail.clarityconnect.com
    X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
    Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 20:52:32 -0500
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    From: Ray Recchia <rrecchia@mail.clarityconnect.com>
    Subject: Re: Words and memes
    In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20020203170922.02c68a00@pop.cogeco.ca>
    References: <004401c1ace3$0c6cdfe0$5cc1b3d1@teddace> <20020202025534.81703.qmail@web12302.mail.yahoo.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Hey Keith

    At 05:23 PM 2/3/2002 -0500, you wrote:
    >At 10:46 AM 03/02/02 -0800, "Dace" <edace@earthlink.net>
    > wrote:
    >
    >snip
    >
    >>The key issue is whether the unit of culture is self-replicated or
    >>intentionally replicated by a conscious agent. Memes are active. Ideas are
    >>passive.
    >
    >Again I think this is a catchy way to express the essence of the "meme
    >about memes"
    >
    >Idea is very close in "meaning space" to meme, but meme has the
    >replication aspect attached.
    >
    >So you could have Watt's *idea* about how to improve steam engines
    >"separate condenser" which you would use to describe Watt's study and
    >coming up with the idea. You would use the *meme* of "separate condenser"
    >when you wanted to talk about Watt's idea spreading like wildfire among
    >the steam engineers of the day.
    >
    >I have often written that an idea fails to be a meme (at best it is a
    >potential meme) when someone has an idea and never communicates the
    >idea. By this line of thinking an idea written on paper is still not a
    >meme until someone (other than the writer) read it. Shades of the spooky
    >observer effects in quantum mechanics!
    >
    >Of course, none of this negates the essence of any particular meme being
    >pure information.
    >
    >Keith Henson
    >
    This is the distinction I would draw. If it hasn't replicated it isn't a
    meme. I am not sure this is the distinction that Ted is drawing though.

    Ray Recchia

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 04 2002 - 02:13:09 GMT