Re: Baseball Test Case

From: AaronLynch@aol.com
Date: Sat Jan 26 2002 - 00:36:04 GMT

  • Next message: salice@gmx.net: "Re: sex and the single meme"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id AAA27480 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 26 Jan 2002 00:40:29 GMT
    From: <AaronLynch@aol.com>
    Message-ID: <a4.200a275f.298353f4@aol.com>
    Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 19:36:04 EST
    Subject: Re: Baseball Test Case
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 113
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Below is a copy of a message I posted several years ago to the memetics list
    that clearly indicates that I do not in any way suggest that team sizes
    translate directly into propagation rates or prevalences. It's not a point I
    wish to argue all over again.

    It takes two teams to play the game, even on Enron Field.
    :-)

    --Aaron Lynch

    At 10:34 AM 9/18/1998, Aaron Lynch wrote:
    >At 08:35 AM 9/18/98 -0700, Tim Rhodes wrote:

    <snip>

    >Aaron,
    >
    >Shouldn't baseball have a conversion rate that is 80% higher than that of
    >basketball? (Nine players per team vs. the five for basketball)
    >
    >How do you explain the fact that this is not the case? In fact, that the
    >opposite is true--the conversion rate for basketball is currently much
    >greater than that for baseball.
    >
    >-Tim Rhodes

    A reasonable question, Tim.

    The answer is that we cannot just compute conversion rates on an a priori
    basis, even in cases were it is very tempting to do so. Peer to peer,
    parent to child, and other modes of transmission still have to be measured.
    If we introduce a new sport requiring 18 players per team, we might very
    well find fewer conversions than a closely related sport with 9 players per
    team. The idea of taking on the bigger task of recruiting 18 players may
    deter people from even trying.

    In the case of baseball and baseball, there is also the matter of
    seasonality. With both indoor and outdoor courts available, recruitment for
    basketball continues during the winter while amateur baseball recruitment
    fades drastically. Evolutionarily, the climatological environment has a
    different impact on the two sports. The increased after-hours availability
    of school and health club basketball courts in the US also favors an
    increased recruitment rate for basketball during the winter.

    As Bill points out, the mass media and famous players play an increased
    role in recent decades, too.

    --Aaron Lynch

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 26 2002 - 01:42:44 GMT