Re: sex and the single meme

From: salice@gmx.net
Date: Fri Jan 25 2002 - 18:16:26 GMT

Next message: AaronLynch@aol.com: "Re: Selfish meme?"

Previous message: Wade Smith: "Re: necessity of mental memes"
In reply to: Wade Smith: "Re: sex and the single meme"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA26072 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 25 Jan 2002 18:22:17 GMT
From: <salice@gmx.net>
To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 19:16:26 +0100
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: sex and the single meme
Message-ID: <3C51AF0A.1532.77E487@localhost>
References: <3C517DCA.8933.B52ABD@localhost>
In-reply-to: <2AA62CD4-11BC-11D6-A35A-003065A0F24C@harvard.edu>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

On 25 Jan 2002, at 12:51, Wade Smith wrote:

> > Yes, but most touches result from brain activity.
> Not being touched. Admittedly, one knows that one is touched
> because the brain and the sensory apparatus are intact and
> functioning, but that is not what we are talking about.

Okay Wade, the discussion was about memetic selection and
whether i get touched by some meme, like some song for
instance, does indeed define my brain.

===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

Next message: AaronLynch@aol.com: "Re: Selfish meme?"
Previous message: Wade Smith: "Re: necessity of mental memes"
In reply to: Wade Smith: "Re: sex and the single meme"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 25 2002 - 18:38:35 GMT