Re: sex and the single meme

From: Joe Dees (joedees@addall.com)
Date: Wed Jan 23 2002 - 04:37:36 GMT

  • Next message: Joe Dees: "Re: A Confusing Example"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id EAA18220 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 23 Jan 2002 04:41:58 GMT
    Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 20:37:36 -0800
    Message-Id: <200201230437.g0N4bal23881@mail15.bigmailbox.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Content-Disposition: inline
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
    X-Mailer: MIME-tools 4.104 (Entity 4.116)
    X-Originating-Ip: [65.80.160.121]
    From: "Joe Dees" <joedees@addall.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: sex and the single meme
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is)

    > "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be> <kennethvanoost@myrealbox.com> Re: sex and the single memeDate: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 20:50:29 +0100
    >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >
    >
    >----- Original Message -----
    >From: Philip Jonkers <PHILIPJONKERS@prodigy.net>
    >> Sex in biological animals provides a faster way to
    >> adapt to extremely competetive and changing
    >> environments. Organisms who don't use sex to adapt were
    >> mostly outcompeted and supplanted by those who did.
    >> The function of sex is reflected by increasing the
    >> variation rate in the evolutionary algorithm.
    >
    >Hi Philip,
    >
    ><< Of course you are right, but the thing is, that, if sex exists in
    >memetics
    >it could be something completely different than sex as seen in the biolo-
    >gical sense of the term.
    >My point is, if a mutation whereby memes should be able to reproduce
    >asexual within a population should occur whereby no ' males ' would be
    >produced and whereby the mutant ' females ' should have the same
    >survivalchances and the same fertility as their no- mutant sisters and they
    >should avoy to re- produce 50 % ' male ', in each generation their amount
    >should increase tremendously.
    >It would explain, in a sense, the speed by which memetic evolution de-
    >velops, no !?
    >
    >On the other hand, to stimulate their suvivalchances, in a way sex would
    >be needed, but adultery far more !!
    >Sex, seen in the biological sense from a human perspective is monogamous.
    >We males, doing it with everybody female to get our genes across, females
    >are more choosy. After all, time and resources must be best spent.
    >But does this apply to memes !? IMO, it doesn 't !
    >The speed of the memetic evolution exceeds any given ' natural ' biological
    >sexual process.
    >If a bird got 8 young from 8 different fathers, we can pre- suppose that
    >atleast 1 will survive when a dramatical change in the environment should
    >occur. Here is it the female who want her genes to get across.
    >In memetics it seems that all the variations survive in one point of the
    >other....
    >
    >I agree that sex is needed to increase the variation rate, but in memetics
    >we get in trouble when the speed of things is concerned.
    >There is no biological process fast enough to explain the speed by which
    >the memetic evolution occurs.
    >IMO, if we count in asexuality, or some ' cloning '- process we can.
    >
    >> Anyway, better and faster ways to adapt automatically
    >> get selected in an evolutionary process
    >> in general.
    >
    ><< Again, yes, but not in memetics !
    >The velocity- factor of the present evolution in memetics can 't be ex-
    >plained. The rate by which people get infected can be measured, but
    >can 't be explained ' how ' !
    >And maybe, the better and faster way in the evolutionary process of
    >memetics is not sex, but asexuality....
    >And if this ends up, one thing is than vey clear, memes have no gender....
    >
    Memetic sex occurs in the brain; it is where we deconstruct memeplexes into their constiturent components and recombine chunks of them in novel ways; then we release our progeny into the cruel world and see if they'll die or thrive.
    >
    >Regards,
    >
    >Kenneth
    >
    >
    >===============================================================
    >This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    >Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    >For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    >see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    ------------------------------------------------------------
    Looking for a book? Want a deal? No problem AddALL!
    http://www.addall.com compares book price at 41 online stores.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 23 2002 - 04:57:49 GMT