Re: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception

From: Joe Dees (joedees@addall.com)
Date: Tue Jan 22 2002 - 02:49:25 GMT

  • Next message: Joe Dees: "RE: Why memeoids?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id CAA14928 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 22 Jan 2002 02:53:48 GMT
    Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 18:49:25 -0800
    Message-Id: <200201220249.g0M2nPY08388@mail15.bigmailbox.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Content-Disposition: inline
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
    X-Mailer: MIME-tools 4.104 (Entity 4.116)
    X-Originating-Ip: [65.80.47.144]
    From: "Joe Dees" <joedees@addall.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is)

    > "Dace" <edace@earthlink.net> <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Re: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory PerceptionDate: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 17:47:23 -0800
    >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >
    >Hi Wade,
    >
    >> Remove the human from culture, and memetic development is
    >> impossible. Memetic behavior requires cultural environment, just as
    >> speech requires a languaged environment to develop. So, far, no-one
    >> is asking that there be 'languemes' in the brain. No, the genetic
    >> development of the human brain selected for speech and language
    >> and culture as a developmental complexity, totally dependent upon a
    >> sustaining environment. Language in the brain is a potential- the actual
    >> speech itself comes from outside, in the form of phonemes that are
    >> heard, not created internally, that fill and fit, like smells, into
    >> prepared regions of the senses. And memes are not found internally.
    >> They are found and created outside. Where they shall remain.
    >
    >How could language not exist in the mind? Yet I agree that it's not in the
    >brain. In fact it logically cannot reside in the brain, for language is a
    >set of abstractions, and abstractions have no definable physical
    >characterisitics. There are no words in brains, only clumps of neurons that
    >"light up" when we comprehend or produce language. To imagine that the
    >co-occurrence of brain activity and mental activity demonstrates that brain
    >causes mind is to commit the well-known fallacy of false cause.
    >
    These pattern-configurations in the brain are translated by the dynamically recursive mind, which emerges from the material substrate brain, as words, among other things (such as images).
    >
    >Ted
    >
    >
    >
    >===============================================================
    >This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    >Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    >For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    >see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    ------------------------------------------------------------
    Looking for a book? Want a deal? No problem AddALL!
    http://www.addall.com compares book price at 41 online stores.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 22 2002 - 03:21:23 GMT