Re: The necessity of mental memes

From: Joe Dees (joedees@addall.com)
Date: Mon Jan 21 2002 - 03:29:17 GMT

  • Next message: Joe Dees: "Re: A Confusing Example"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id DAA11894 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 21 Jan 2002 03:33:40 GMT
    Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 19:29:17 -0800
    Message-Id: <200201210329.g0L3THw31768@mail2.bigmailbox.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Content-Disposition: inline
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
    X-Mailer: MIME-tools 4.104 (Entity 4.116)
    X-Originating-Ip: [66.156.194.69]
    From: "Joe Dees" <joedees@addall.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: The necessity of mental memes
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is)

    > memetics@mmu.ac.ukDate: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 21:06:00 -0500
    > "Philip Jonkers" <PHILIPJONKERS@prodigy.net> Re: The necessity of mental memesReply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >
    >Joe:
    >>A third is to access the PET scan and fMRI studies
    >that indicate particular cortical energy usage changes
    >in specific areas correlated with the performance of
    >particular tasks, both physical and mental. the gun
    >is smoking, and internal meme location no longer may
    >be dismissed on the grounds of a lack of empirical
    >evidence. Of course, we are not able to decode thses
    >indications in a fine-grained manner, but we DO know
    >that when a person listens to music, or reads poetry,
    >or reads text, or imagines a landscape, or performs
    >mental mathematical calculations, or remembers a word
    >string, that in each case, a different portion of the
    >brain burns more sugar (meaning that it needs more
    >energy because it is being used).
    >
    >In principle you may be right. But in practise it is
    >extremely hard to even try to get a bearing on a
    >neural correlate for say the meme as trivial as,
    >`terrorism is destructive...'. I think the virtue
    >and validity of mind-memetics would lie in staying
    >on an abstract description kind of path.
    >
    Eventually we will have to scientize memetically empirically. At the moment, we can only broad-brush-stroke correlate (as to major types), but we shall achieve finer and finer grained differentiations as time and technology marches on.
    >
    >
    >Philip.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >===============================================================
    >This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    >Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    >For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    >see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    ------------------------------------------------------------
    Looking for a book? Want a deal? No problem AddALL!
    http://www.addall.com compares book price at 41 online stores.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 21 2002 - 04:30:35 GMT